Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood-Flow Restriction in Relation to Muscle Function, Mass, and Functionality in Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Rodrigues, Reynaldo; Ferraz, Rodrigo B; Kurimori, Ceci O; Guedes, Lissiane K; Lima, Fernanda R; de Sá-Pinto, Ana L; Gualano, Bruno; Roschel, Hamilton.
Afiliação
  • Rodrigues R; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ferraz RB; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Kurimori CO; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Guedes LK; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Lima FR; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Sá-Pinto AL; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Gualano B; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Roschel H; Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 72(6): 787-797, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31033228
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effects of a low-load resistance training program associated with partial blood-flow restriction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS:

Forty-eight women with RA were randomized into 1 of 3 groups high-load resistance training (HL-RT; 70% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), low-load resistance training (30% 1RM) with partial blood-flow restriction training (BFRT), and a control group. Patients completed a 12-week supervised training program and were assessed for lower-extremity 1RM, quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA), physical function (timed-stands test [TST], timed-up-and-go test [TUG], and Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]), and quality of life (Short Form 36 health survey [SF-36]) at baseline and after the intervention.

RESULTS:

BFRT and HL-RT were similarly effective in increasing maximum dynamic strength in both leg press (22.8% and 24.2%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all) and knee extension (19.7% and 23.8%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all). Quadriceps CSA was also significantly increased in both BFRT and HL-RT (9.5% and 10.8%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all). Comparable improvements in TST (11.2% and 14.7%; P < 0.0001 for all) and TUG (-6.8% [P < 0.0053] and -8.7% [P < 0.0001]) were also observed in BFRT and HL-RT, respectively. Improvements in both groups were significantly greater than those of the control group (P < 0.05 for all). SF-36 role physical and bodily pain and HAQ scores were improved only in BFRT (45.7%, 22.5%, and -55.9%, respectively; P < 0.05 for all). HL-RT resulted in 1 case of withdrawal and several cases of exercise-induced pain, which did not occur in BFRT.

CONCLUSION:

BFRT was effective in improving muscle strength, mass, function, and health-related quality of life in patients with RA, emerging as a viable therapeutic modality in RA management.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional / Treinamento Resistido Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional / Treinamento Resistido Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article