Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effect of Cerebellar tDCS on Sequential Motor Response Selection.
Jongkees, Bryant J; Immink, Maarten A; Boer, Olga D; Yavari, Fatemeh; Nitsche, Michael A; Colzato, Lorenza S.
Afiliação
  • Jongkees BJ; Cognitive Psychology Unit & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, The Netherlands. b.j.jongkees@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
  • Immink MA; School of Health Sciences & Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Boer OD; Cognitive Psychology Unit & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Yavari F; Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
  • Nitsche MA; Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
  • Colzato LS; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Cerebellum ; 18(4): 738-749, 2019 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31062282
ABSTRACT
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently alters cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity. So far, few studies have investigated the behavioral effects of applying tDCS to the cerebellum. Given the cerebellum's inhibitory effects on cortical motor areas as well as its role in fine motor control and motor coordination, we investigated whether cerebellar tDCS can modulate response selection processes and motor sequence learning. Seventy-two participants received either cerebellar anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), or sham (placebo) tDCS while performing a serial reaction time task (SRTT). To compare acute and long-term effects of stimulation on behavioral performance, participants came back for follow-up testing at 24 h after stimulation. Results indicated no group differences in performance prior to tDCS. During stimulation, tDCS did not affect sequence-specific learning, but anodal as compared to cathodal and sham stimulations did modulate response selection processes. Specifically, anodal tDCS increased response latencies independent of whether a trained or transfer sequence was being performed, although this effect became smaller throughout training. At the 24-h follow-up, the group that previously received anodal tDCS again demonstrated increased response latencies, but only when the previously trained sequence and a transfer sequence had to be performed in the same experimental block. This increased behavioral interference tentatively points to a detrimental effect of anodal cerebellar tDCS on sequence consolidation/retention. These results are consistent with the notion that the cerebellum exerts an inhibitory effect on cortical motor areas, which can impair sequential response selection when this inhibition is strengthened by tDCS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizagem Seriada / Cerebelo / Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizagem Seriada / Cerebelo / Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article