Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A general approach to risk modeling using partial surrogate markers with application to perioperative acute kidney injury.
Smith, Derek K; Smith, Loren E; Billings, Frederic T; Blume, Jeffrey D.
Afiliação
  • Smith DK; 1Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 11000, Nashville, TN 37212 USA.
  • Smith LE; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA.
  • Billings FT; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA.
  • Blume JD; 1Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 11000, Nashville, TN 37212 USA.
Diagn Progn Res ; 1: 21, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31093550
BACKGROUND: Surrogate outcomes are often utilized when disease outcomes are difficult to directly measure. When a biological threshold effect exists, surrogate outcomes may only represent disease in specific subpopulations. We refer to these outcomes as "partial surrogate outcomes." We hypothesized that risk models of partial surrogate outcomes would perform poorly if they fail to account for this population heterogeneity. We developed criteria for predictive model development using partial surrogate outcomes and demonstrate their importance in model selection and evaluation within the clinical example of serum creatinine, a partial surrogate outcome for acute kidney injury. METHODS: Data from 4737 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a major academic center were obtained. Linear and mixture models were fit on maximum 2-day serum creatinine change as a surrogate for estimated glomerular filtration rate at 90 days after surgery (eGFR90), adjusted for known AKI risk factors. The AUC for eGFR90 decline and Spearman's rho were calculated to compare model discrimination between the linear model and a single component of the mixture model deemed to represent the informative subpopulation. Simulation studies based on the clinical data were conducted to further demonstrate the consistency and limitations of the procedure. RESULTS: The mixture model was highly favored over the linear model with BICs of 2131.3 and 5034.3, respectively. When model discrimination was evaluated with respect to the partial surrogate, the linear model displays superior performance (p < 0.001); however, when it was evaluated with respect to the target outcome, the mixture model approach displays superior performance (AUC difference p = 0.002; Spearman's difference p = 0.020). Simulation studies demonstrate that the nature of the heterogeneity determines the magnitude of any advantage the mixture model. CONCLUSIONS: Partial surrogate outcomes add complexity and limitations to risk score modeling, including the potential for the usual metrics of discrimination to be misleading. Partial surrogacy can be potentially uncovered and appropriately accounted for using a mixture model approach. Serum creatinine behaved as a partial surrogate outcome consistent with two patient subpopulations, one representing patients whose injury did not exceed their renal functional reserve and a second population representing patients whose injury did exceed renal functional reserve.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article