Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An accelerometry and observational study to quantify upper limb use after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation.
Chin, Lay Fong; Hayward, Kathryn S; Soh, Aloysius Jun An; Tan, Chin Mei; Wong, Cheryl Jing Ru; Loh, Jia Wei; Loke, Genevieve Jia Hui; Brauer, Sandra.
Afiliação
  • Chin LF; Rehabilitation Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
  • Hayward KS; Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Soh AJA; NMRC Singapore, Ministry of Health Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tan CM; Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Wong CJR; AVERT Lab, Stroke Theme, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Loh JW; NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Loke GJH; Physiotherapy Department, Singapore Institute of Technology-Nanyang Polytechnics, Singapore.
  • Brauer S; Physiotherapy Department, Singapore Institute of Technology-Nanyang Polytechnics, Singapore.
Physiother Res Int ; 24(4): e1784, 2019 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31095833
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The objectives of the study are to characterize paretic upper limb (UL) use in people with different levels of impairment 4 weeks poststroke and to compare accelerometry and direct observational approaches.

METHODS:

Twelve stroke inpatients (five mild, three moderate, and four severe UL impairment) were recruited from a rehabilitation hospital. UL use was measured using accelerometry (24 hr) and direct observation (12 hr of behavioural mapping). Accelerometry variables included duration of use, use ratio, magnitude ratio, bilateral magnitude, and variation ratio. Direct observation recorded the duration of use and type of UL movement (e.g., functional vs. non-functional).

RESULTS:

From accelerometry data, people with mild, moderate, and severe UL impairments used their paretic UL 59%, 45%, and 22% of a 24 hr-day, respectively. People with severe UL impairment had the lowest paretic UL use duration (median 1.49 hr/day), magnitude ratio, and variation ratio compared with people with mild and moderate UL impairment. From 12 hr of observational data, people with mild impairment were using their UL for 37.8% of the observed time, whereas the people with moderate and severe impairment were using their UL 15.8% and 4.9%, respectively. UL movements for the mild cohort were mainly functional, whereas UL movements of the moderate and severe cohorts were mainly non-functional. UL movements were predominantly active for the mild and moderate cohorts but passive for the severe cohort. Duration of paretic UL use from accelerometry and observation data were highly correlated (ICC > 0.8), but the absolute percentage error between methods ranged from 34.2% to 42.7%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Paretic UL use within the first 4 weeks poststroke differs across levels of impairment in this exploratory study. Accelerometry and observation findings of paretic UL use were correlated and may be needed in different situations as they capture different information.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Paresia / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Extremidade Superior / Mãos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Paresia / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Extremidade Superior / Mãos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article