Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical pharmacokinetics of a dexmedetomidine-methadone combination in dogs undergoing routine anaesthesia after buccal or intramuscular administration.
Di Cesare, Federica; Gioeni, Daniela; Ravasio, Giuliano; Pellegrini, Alberto; Lucatello, Lorena; Bisutti, Vittoria; Villa, Roberto; Cagnardi, Petra.
Afiliação
  • Di Cesare F; Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie per la Salute, la Produzione Animale e la Sicurezza Alimentare, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Gioeni D; Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Ravasio G; Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Pellegrini A; UnireLab S.r.L, Settimo Milanese, Milan, Italy.
  • Lucatello L; Dipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata ed Alimentazione, Università degli Studi di Padova, Legnaro (PD), Italy.
  • Bisutti V; Dipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata ed Alimentazione, Università degli Studi di Padova, Legnaro (PD), Italy.
  • Villa R; Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie per la Salute, la Produzione Animale e la Sicurezza Alimentare, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Cagnardi P; Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie per la Salute, la Produzione Animale e la Sicurezza Alimentare, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
J Vet Pharmacol Ther ; 42(4): 392-400, 2019 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31197847
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to define the pharmacokinetic profiles of dexmedetomidine and methadone administered simultaneously in dogs by either an oral transmucosal route or intramuscular route and to determine the bioavailability of the oral transmucosal administration relative to the intramuscular one of both drugs, so as the applicability of this administration route in dogs. Twelve client-owned dogs, scheduled for diagnostic procedures, were treated with a combination of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (10 µg/kg) and methadone hydrochloride (0.4 mg/kg) through an oral transmucosal route or intramuscularly. Oral transmucosal administration caused ptyalism in most subjects, and intramuscular administration caused transient peripheral vasoconstriction. The results showed reduced and delayed absorption of both dexmedetomidine and methadone when administered through an oral transmucosal route, with median (range) Cmax values of 0.82 (0.42-1.49) ng/ml and 13.22 (2.80-52.30) ng/ml, respectively. The relative bioavailability was low 16.34% (dexmedetomidine) and 15.5% (methadone). Intramuscular administration resulted in a more efficient absorption profile, with AUC and Cmax values for both drugs approximately 10 times higher. Dexmedetomidine and methadone administered simultaneously by an oral transmucosal route using injectable formulations were not well absorbed through the oral mucosa. Nevertheless, additional studies on these drugs combination using alternative administration routes are recommended.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dexmedetomidina / Cães / Anestesia / Metadona Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dexmedetomidina / Cães / Anestesia / Metadona Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article