Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of Two Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems in Retreatment Procedure With or Without Laser-Activated Irrigation: An In Vitro Study.
Dönmez Özkan, Hicran; Kaval, Mehmet Emin; Özkan, Gökhan; Yigit Özer, Senem.
Afiliação
  • Dönmez Özkan H; 1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.
  • Kaval ME; 2Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Özkan G; 3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.
  • Yigit Özer S; 1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 37(8): 495-499, 2019 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31211638
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of HyFlex EDM (Coltene/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) and ProTaper Universal Retreatment Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) Systems [The ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PTR), Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland] in the removal of the root canal filling materials with or without laser activated irrigation. Materials and

methods:

The root canals of 60 human mandibular premolars were instrumented with K files up to size 35 at a working length; the step-back procedure was performed in 1 mm increments up to size 50. Next, the teeth were obturated using the lateral compaction technique with gutta-percha and resin-based sealer, and they were randomly divided into two groups (n = 30) according to the retreatment systems PTR and HyFlex EDM NiTi rotary files. Then, each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 15), laser [photon-induced photo-acoustic streaming (PIPS); Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia] activated irrigation and conventional needle irrigation group. Following these procedures, the specimens were evaluated using micro-computed tomography.

Results:

There was no significant difference between the instrumentation systems regarding the cleaning efficacy (χ2 = 0.754; p = 0.86). Additionally, PIPS method did not have a significant effect on the removal of the filling material compared to conventional needle irrigation.

Conclusions:

Both instrumentation systems were effective in removing the filling material, but neither was able to remove the filling material completely. PIPS method did not show a significant additional effect regarding the removal of filling material.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Obturação do Canal Radicular / Instrumentos Odontológicos / Técnicas Fotoacústicas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Obturação do Canal Radicular / Instrumentos Odontológicos / Técnicas Fotoacústicas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article