Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Large head ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in primary total hip arthroplasty: average 3-year follow-up of a multicentre study.
Lavigne, Martin; Vendittoli, Pascal-André; Virolainen, Petri; Corten, Kristoff; Martinez, Mariano; Zicat, Bernard; Peter, Viju; Bloem, Rolf; Miazzolo, Nicolas; Remes, Ville.
Afiliação
  • Lavigne M; Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont, University of Montreal affiliated hospital, Montreal, Canada.
  • Vendittoli PA; Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont, University of Montreal affiliated hospital, Montreal, Canada.
  • Virolainen P; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Corten K; Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Campus St Jan, Genk, Belgium.
  • Martinez M; Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
  • Zicat B; The Mater Hospital, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Peter V; Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Teaching Hospitals, Liverpool, UK.
  • Bloem R; Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, The Netherlands.
  • Miazzolo N; Clinique Mutualiste Catalane, Perpignan, France.
  • Remes V; JokilaaksonTerveys Oy, Jämsä, Finland.
Hip Int ; 30(6): 711-717, 2020 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31296057
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Surgeons are increasingly using larger femoral head sizes in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to improve stability and reduce the rate of dislocation, 1 of the leading causes of revision surgery. Large ceramic head sizes up to 48 mm can now be used with monoblock acetabular components. National registries have shown promising results at short-term with large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic THA, with very low revision rates.This study reports on the average 3-year follow up of a press-fit monoblock large diameter acetabular shell with a pre-assembled ceramic liner, with emphasis on the radiographic outcome, complications related to the implantation of the cup, and the patient's clinical outcome.

METHODS:

170 hips in 169 patients were reviewed at an average 38 ± 5.8 months following surgery.

RESULTS:

The radiographic review revealed no acetabular cup loosening, no osteolysis and no cup migration. 1 acetabular cup was revised for malposition. The patient clinical outcome and the satisfaction rate were excellent. At 3 years, 7.1% of patients complained of groin pain and 3.5% spontaneously reported hip joint generated noise. 1 patient sustained a non-recurrent traumatic hip dislocation 2 years post surgery.

CONCLUSIONS:

New technology should be introduced cautiously on the market. This is especially true for the large diameter ceramic monoblock acetabular component used in this study since it involves a new acetabular component design. At short term, we have not identified new modes of failure with this implant. Longer follow-up is still needed to assess the safety of large ceramic bearing in THA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cerâmica / Artroplastia de Quadril / Cabeça do Fêmur / Luxação do Quadril / Prótese de Quadril / Acetábulo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cerâmica / Artroplastia de Quadril / Cabeça do Fêmur / Luxação do Quadril / Prótese de Quadril / Acetábulo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article