Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Diagnostic Performance in Screening Breast MRI.
Sippo, Dorothy A; Rutledge, Geoffrey M; Mercaldo, Sarah F; Burk, Kristine S; Edmonds, Christine E; Dang, Pragya A; Lehman, Constance D.
Afiliação
  • Sippo DA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center, Wang Ambulatory Care Building, Suite 240, 15 Parkman Street, Boston MA, 02114. Electronic address: dsippo@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Rutledge GM; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center, Wang Ambulatory Care Building, Suite 240, 15 Parkman Street, Boston MA, 02114.
  • Mercaldo SF; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center, Wang Ambulatory Care Building, Suite 240, 15 Parkman Street, Boston MA, 02114.
  • Burk KS; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center, Wang Ambulatory Care Building, Suite 240, 15 Parkman Street, Boston MA, 02114.
  • Edmonds CE; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center, Wang Ambulatory Care Building, Suite 240, 15 Parkman Street, Boston MA, 02114.
  • Dang PA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Lehman CD; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center, Wang Ambulatory Care Building, Suite 240, 15 Parkman Street, Boston MA, 02114.
Acad Radiol ; 27(5): 663-671, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31327575
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE AND

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the impact of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on diagnostic performance in screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Consecutive screening breast MRIs performed at our institution from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed in a HIPAA-compliant manner with institutional review board approval. BPE was extracted from radiology reports and examinations grouped into minimal/mild (lower) or moderate/marked (higher) BPE. Performance measures were compared between the two groups with Pearson's χ2 test and with logistic regression to adjust for possible confounders of age, screening indication, mammographic density, available prior MRI, and examination year, using lower BPE as the reference group.

RESULTS:

For 4686 screening MRIs performed in 2446 women, BPE was reported as minimal or mild for 3975 (85%) examinations and moderate or marked for 711(15%). Following logistic regression to adjust for multiple confounders, abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) significantly differed between the two BPE groups. AIR was 13% (89/711) in the higher BPE group versus 7% (295/3975) in the lower BPE group with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.37 (95% confidence interval 1.03, 1.82). After adjustment, all other performance metrics, including cancer detection rate, positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity did not significantly differ between the two BPE groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Higher BPE on screening MRI is associated with higher abnormal interpretation rate, with no impact on cancer detection rate, sensitivity, or specificity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article