Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.
Özlek, Esin; Neelakantan, Prasanna; Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka; Belli, Sema; Ugur, Mehmet; Kavut, Idris.
Afiliação
  • Özlek E; Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Van Yuzuncu Yil, Van 65090, Turkey.
  • Neelakantan P; Discipline of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. prasanna@hku.hk.
  • Matinlinna JP; Dental Materials Science, Discipline of Applied Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Belli S; Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Selcuk, Konya 42250, Turkey.
  • Ugur M; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Van Yuzuncu Yil, Van 65090, Turkey.
  • Kavut I; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Van Yuzuncu Yil, Van 65090, Turkey.
Dent J (Basel) ; 7(3)2019 Aug 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31374874
ABSTRACT
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of two new fiber post systems (FiberSite™ Post and Cytec™ Blanco Post) cemented with two different adhesive resin cements (Panavia™ SA and Maxcem™ Elite). Root canals of sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper Universal™ rotary files (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, York, PA, USA). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) during instrumentation. After root canal preparation, the canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (1 min), followed by 2 mL of 5.25% (5 min) NaOCI, and 2 mL saline. The root canals were dried with paper points and divided randomly into two study groups (n = 30) according to the type of post system Group 1, FiberSite™ Post (MegaDental, Partanna, Italy); and group 2, Cytec™ Blanco Post (Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany), with one of the two adhesive resin cements Subgroup A, Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); subgroup B, Maxcem™ Elite (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Following thermocycling, the adhesion strength was evaluated using the push-out adhesion (bond) strength test. Fractographic analysis was performed using stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (p = 0.05). The adhesion strength values of both the posts were significantly higher when cemented with subgroup B (Maxcem™ Elite). The highest adhesion strength value was demonstrated by group 1B (FiberSite™ post cemented with Maxcem™ Elite cement). The type of post did not have a significant impact on the bond strength values for either cement material.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article