Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost saving of switching to equivalent inhalers and its effect on health outcomes.
Bloom, Chloe I; Douglas, Ian; Olney, Jack; D'Ancona, Grainne; Smeeth, Liam; Quint, Jennifer K.
Afiliação
  • Bloom CI; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK chloe.bloom06@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Douglas I; Faculty of Epidemiology and Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Olney J; Centre for Health and Economics Policy Innovation, Imperial College London Business School, London, UK.
  • D'Ancona G; Pharmacy Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.
  • Smeeth L; Faculty of Epidemiology and Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Quint JK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Thorax ; 74(11): 1078-1086, 2019 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31383774
BACKGROUND: Switching inhalers to cheaper equivalent products is often advocated as a necessary cost saving measure, yet the impact on patient's health and healthcare utilisation has not been measured. METHODS: We identified asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients from UK primary care electronic healthcare records between 2000 and 2016. A self-controlled case series was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR); comparing outcome rates during the risk period, 3 months after the exposure (financially motivated switch), and control periods (preswitch and postrisk period). Four outcomes were assessed: disease exacerbation, general practitioner consultation, non-specific respiratory events and adverse-medication events. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated to assess adherence. 2017 National Health Service indicative prices were used to estimate cost differences per equivalent dose. RESULTS: We identified a cohort of 569 901 asthma and 171 231 COPD regular inhaler users, 2% and 6% had been switched, respectively. Inhaler switches between a brand-to-generic inhaler, and all other switches (brand-to-brand, generic-to-generic, generic-to-brand), were associated with reduced exacerbations (brand-to-generic: IRR=0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88; all other: IRR=0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.88). Gender, age, therapeutic class, inhaler device and inhaler-technique checks did not significantly modify this association (p<0.05). The rate of consultations, respiratory-events and adverse-medication events did not change significantly (consultations: IRR=1.00, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.01; respiratory-events: IRR=0.96, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.97; adverse-medication-events: IRR=1.05, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.15). Adherence significantly increased post-switch (median MPR: pre-switch=54%, post-switch=62%; p<0.001). Switching patients, in the cohort of regular inhaler users, to the cheapest equivalent inhaler, could have saved around £6 million annually. CONCLUSION: Switching to an equivalent inhaler in patients with asthma or COPD appeared safe and did not negatively affect patient's health or healthcare utilisation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores / Redução de Custos / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores / Redução de Custos / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article