Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The incidence and risk factors of stent fracture in patients treated for proximal common carotid artery stenosis.
Vértes, Miklós; Nguyen, Dat Tin; Székely, György; Bérczi, Ákos; Dósa, Edit.
Afiliação
  • Vértes M; Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Nguyen DT; Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Székely G; Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Bérczi Á; Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Dósa E; Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: dosaedit@yahoo.com.
J Vasc Surg ; 71(3): 824-831.e1, 2020 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31405760
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim was to identify the incidence of and predictors for common carotid artery (CCA) stent fractures (SFs) and to examine the effect of SFs on the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

METHODS:

Seventy patients (37 women; median age, 60.9 years) who were stented for significant (≥60%) proximal CCA stenosis from 2006 to 2016 and revisited us to determine SF using fluoroscopy in 2018 were evaluated. Seventy stents were deployed; among them 87.1% were balloon-expandable and 12.9% were self-expandable. SFs were classified as type I (fracture of one strut), type II (fracture of multiple struts without stent deformity), type III (fracture of multiple struts with stent deformity), type IV (complete fracture of the stent without a gap), and type V (complete fracture of the stent with a gap). Duplex ultrasound examination was used for monitoring stent patency. Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression analyses, and a log-rank test and a gamma correlation analysis were applied as statistical methods.

RESULTS:

The patients were followed for 75.5 months (range, 47-109 months). Significant (≥70%) ISR was observed in eight patients (11.4%). Reintervention was performed in four cases (5.7%). Twenty-seven SFs (38.6%; type I, 8; type II, 10; type III, 4; type IV, 2; and type V, 3) were found. Calcification was shown to be a significant predictor for SF (odds ratio, 13.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-45.1; P < .001). There was no significant difference between the fractured and the nonfractured group regarding the number of patients with ISR and reintervention (P = .701 and P = .636, respectively). Neither did the primary patency rates differ significantly (P = .372) in patients with and without SF.

CONCLUSIONS:

Fractures frequently occur in a wide variety of stent devices deployed in the proximal CCA, but SFs seem to have no effect on ISR and reintervention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Falha de Prótese / Stents / Estenose das Carótidas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Falha de Prótese / Stents / Estenose das Carótidas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article