Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting Humphrey 10-2 visual field from 24-2 visual field in eyes with advanced glaucoma.
Sugisaki, Kenji; Asaoka, Ryo; Inoue, Toshihiro; Yoshikawa, Keiji; Kanamori, Akiyasu; Yamazaki, Yoshio; Ishikawa, Shinichiro; Nemoto, Hodaka; Iwase, Aiko; Araie, Makoto.
Afiliação
  • Sugisaki K; Ophthalmology, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan sugisaktky@gmail.com.
  • Asaoka R; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Inoue T; Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Yoshikawa K; Ophthalmology, Yoshikawa Eye Clinics, Hashimoto, Japan.
  • Kanamori A; Division of Ophthalmology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
  • Yamazaki Y; Ophthalmology, Tokai University Tokyo Hospital, Shibuya-ku, Japan.
  • Ishikawa S; Department of Ophthalmology, Saga University Faculty of Medicine, Saga, Japan.
  • Nemoto H; Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Chiyoda-ku, Japan.
  • Iwase A; Tajimi Iwase Eye Clinic, Tajimi, Japan.
  • Araie M; Department of Ophthalmology, Kanto Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Setagaya-ku, Japan.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 104(5): 642-647, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31481390
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To predict Humphrey Field Analyzer Central 10-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm-Standard test (HFA 10-2) results (Carl Zeiss Meditec, San Leandro, CA) from HFA 24-2 results of the same eyes with advanced glaucoma.

METHODS:

Training and testing HFA 24-2 and 10-2 data sets, respectively, consisted of 175 eyes (175 patients) and 44 eyes (44 patients) with open advanced glaucoma (mean deviation of HFA 24-2 ≤-20 dB). Using the training data set, the 68 total deviation (TD) values of the HFA 10-2 test points were predicted from those of the innermost 16 HFA 24-2 test points in the same eye, using image processing or various machine learning methods including bilinear interpolation (IP) as a standard for comparison. The absolute prediction error (PredError) was calculated by applying each method to the testing data set.

RESULTS:

The mean (SD) test-retest variability of the HFA 10-2 results in the testing data set was 2.1±1.0 dB, while the IP method yielded a PredError of 5.0±1.7 dB. Among the methods tested, support vector regression (SVR) provided a smallest PredError (4.0±1.5 dB). SVR predicted retinal sensitivity at HFA 10-2 test points in the preserved 'central isle' of advanced glaucoma from HFA 24-2 results of the same eye within an error range of about 25%, while error range was approximately twice of the test-retest variability.

CONCLUSION:

Applying SVR to HFA 24-2 results allowed us to predict TD values at HFA 10-2 test points of the same eye with advanced glaucoma with an error range of about 25%.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Campos Visuais / Pressão Intraocular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Campos Visuais / Pressão Intraocular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article