Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of a new bioceramic endodontic sealer containing calcium hydroxide.
Benetti, Francine; de Azevedo Queiroz, Índia Olinta; Oliveira, Pedro Henrique Chaves de; Conti, Leticia Citelli; Azuma, Mariane Maffei; Oliveira, Sandra Helena Penha de; Cintra, Luciano Tavares Angelo.
Afiliação
  • Benetti F; Departament of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Estaudal Paulista - Unesp, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
  • de Azevedo Queiroz ÍO; Departament of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Estaudal Paulista - Unesp, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
  • Oliveira PHC; Departament of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Estaudal Paulista - Unesp, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
  • Conti LC; Departament of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Estaudal Paulista - Unesp, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
  • Azuma MM; Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, aMI, USA.
  • Oliveira SHP; Department of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, Universidade Estaudal Paulista - Unesp, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
  • Cintra LTA; Departament of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Estaudal Paulista - Unesp, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res ; 33: e042, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31508725
ABSTRACT
This study evaluated the cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of a new bioceramic endodontic sealer (i.e., Sealer Plus BC) in comparison with those of MTA Fillapex and AH Plus. L929 fibroblasts were cultured and Alamar Blue was used to evaluate cell viability of diluted extracts (150, 1100, and 1200) from each sealer at 24 h. Polyethylene tubes that were filled with material or empty (as a control) were implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of rats. The rats were killed after 7 and 30 d (n = 8), and the tubes were removed for histological analysis. Parametric data was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA test, and nonparametric data was analyzed via the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn test (p < 0.05). A reduction in cell viability was observed in the extracts that were more diluted for Sealer Plus BC when compared to that of Control and AH Plus (p < 0.05). However, the 150 dilution of the Sealer Plus BC was similar to that of the Control (p > 0.05). Conversely, more diluted extracts of MTA Fillapex (1200) and AH Plus (1100 and 1200) were similar to the Control (p > 0.05). Histological analysis performed at 7 d did not indicate any significant difference between tissue response for all materials, and the fibrous capsule was thick (p > 0.05). At 30 d, Sealer Plus BC was similar to the Control (p > 0.05) and MTA Fillapex and AH Plus exhibited greater inflammation than the Control (p < 0.05). The fibrous capsule was thin for the Control and for most specimens of Sealer Plus BC and AH Plus. Thus, Sealer Plus BC is biocompatible when compared to MTA Fillapex and AH Plus, and it is less cytotoxic when less-diluted extracts are used.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Cimentos Ósseos / Hidróxido de Cálcio / Cerâmica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Cimentos Ósseos / Hidróxido de Cálcio / Cerâmica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article