Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of small nerve fiber dysfunction in type 2 diabetes.
Ekman, Linnéa; Thrainsdottir, Soley; Englund, Elisabet; Thomsen, Niels; Rosén, Ingmar; Hazer Rosberg, Derya Burcu; Petersson, Jesper; Eriksson, Karl-Fredrik; Dahlin, Lars B.
Afiliação
  • Ekman L; Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Thrainsdottir S; Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Englund E; Department of Neurology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Thomsen N; Department of Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Rosén I; Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Hazer Rosberg DB; Department of Translational Medicine - Hand Surgery, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Petersson J; Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Neurophysiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Eriksson KF; Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Dahlin LB; Department of Translational Medicine - Hand Surgery, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 141(1): 38-46, 2020 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549387
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess potential correlations between intraepidermal nerve fiber densities (IENFD), graded with light microscopy, and clinical measures of peripheral neuropathy in elderly male subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and type 2 diabetes (T2DM), respectively. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

IENFD was assessed in thin sections of skin biopsies from distal leg in 86 men (71-77 years); 24 NGT, 15 IGT, and 47 T2DM. Biopsies were immunohistochemically stained for protein gene product (PGP) 9.5, and intraepidermal nerve fibers (IENF) were quantified manually by light microscopy. IENFD was compared between groups with different glucose tolerance and related to neurophysiological tests, including nerve conduction study (NCS; sural and peroneal nerve), quantitative sensory testing (QST), and clinical examination (Total Neuropathy Score; Neuropathy Symptom Score and Neuropathy Disability Score).

RESULTS:

Absent IENF was seen in subjects with T2DM (n = 10; 21%) and IGT (n = 1; 7%) but not in NGT. IENFD correlated weakly negatively with HbA1c (r = -.268, P = .013) and Total Neuropathy Score (r = -.219, P = .042). Positive correlations were found between IENFD and sural nerve amplitude (r = .371, P = .001) as well as conduction velocity of both the sural (r = .241, P = .029) and peroneal nerve (r = .258, P = .018). Proportions of abnormal sural nerve amplitude became significantly higher with decreasing IENFD. No correlation was found with QST. Inter-rater reliability of IENFD assessment was good (ICC = 0.887).

CONCLUSIONS:

Signs of neuropathy are becoming more prevalent with decreasing IENFD. IENFD can be meaningfully evaluated in thin histopathological sections using the presented technique to detect neuropathy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Neuropatias Diabéticas / Fibras Nervosas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Neuropatias Diabéticas / Fibras Nervosas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article