Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimating PTV Margins in Head and Neck Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) Through Target Site Analysis of Positioning and Intrafractional Accuracy.
Mesko, Shane; Wang, He; Tung, Samuel; Wang, Congjun; Pasalic, Dario; Chapman, Bhavana V; Moreno, Amy C; Reddy, Jay P; Garden, Adam S; Rosenthal, David I; Gunn, G Brandon; Frank, Steven J; Fuller, Clifton D; Morrison, William; Phan, Jack.
Afiliação
  • Mesko S; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Wang H; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Tung S; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Wang C; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Pasalic D; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Chapman BV; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Moreno AC; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Reddy JP; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Garden AS; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Rosenthal DI; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Gunn GB; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Frank SJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Fuller CD; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Morrison W; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Phan J; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: jphan@mdanderson.org.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 106(1): 185-193, 2020 01 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31580928
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Recurrent or previously irradiated head and neck cancers (HNC) are therapeutically challenging and may benefit from high-dose, highly accurate radiation techniques, such as stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Here, we compare set-up and positioning accuracy across HNC subsites to further optimize the treatment process and planning target volume (PTV) margin recommendations for head and neck SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS We prospectively collected data on 405 treatment fractions across 79 patients treated with SABR for recurrent/previously irradiated HNC. First, interfractional error was determined by comparing ExacTrac x-ray to the treatment plan. Patients were then shifted and residual error was measured with repeat x-ray. Next, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was compared with ExacTrac for positioning agreement, and final shifts were applied. Lastly, intrafractional error was measured with x-ray before each arc. Results were stratified by treatment site into skull base, neck/parotid, and mucosal.

RESULTS:

Most patients (66.7%) were treated to 45 Gy in 5 fractions (range, 21-47.5 Gy in 3-5 fractions). The initial mean ± standard deviation interfractional errors were -0.2 ± 1.4 mm (anteroposterior), 0.2 ± 1.8 mm (craniocaudal), and -0.1 ± 1.7 mm (left-right). Interfractional 3-dimensional vector error was 2.48 ± 1.44, with skull base significantly lower than other sites (2.22 vs 2.77; P = .0016). All interfractional errors were corrected to within 1.3 mm and 1.8°. CBCT agreed with ExacTrac to within 3.6 mm and 3.4°. CBCT disagreements and intrafractional errors of >1 mm or >1° occurred at significantly lower rates in skull base sites (CBCT 16.4% vs 50.0% neck, 52.0% mucosal, P < .0001; intrafractional 22.0% vs 48.7% all others, P < .0001). Final PTVs were 1.5 mm (skull base), 2.0 mm (neck/parotid), and 1.8 mm (mucosal).

CONCLUSIONS:

Head and neck SABR PTV margins should be optimized by target site. PTV margins of 1.5 to 2 mm may be sufficient in the skull base, whereas 2 to 2.5 mm may be necessary for neck and mucosal targets. When using ExacTrac, skull base sites show significantly fewer uncertainties throughout the treatment process, but neck/mucosal targets may require the addition of CBCT to account for positioning errors and internal organ motion.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiocirurgia / Erros de Configuração em Radioterapia / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiocirurgia / Erros de Configuração em Radioterapia / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article