Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physiological effects of high-flow oxygen in tracheostomized patients.
Natalini, Daniele; Grieco, Domenico L; Santantonio, Maria Teresa; Mincione, Lucrezia; Toni, Flavia; Anzellotti, Gian Marco; Eleuteri, Davide; Di Giannatale, Pierluigi; Antonelli, Massimo; Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio.
Afiliação
  • Natalini D; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Grieco DL; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Santantonio MT; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Mincione L; Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesia Analgesia, Perioperative and Intensive Care, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Gabriele d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
  • Toni F; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Anzellotti GM; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Eleuteri D; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Di Giannatale P; Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesia Analgesia, Perioperative and Intensive Care, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Gabriele d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
  • Antonelli M; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione 'Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Maggiore SM; Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesia Analgesia, Perioperative and Intensive Care, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Gabriele d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy. salvatore.maggiore@u
Ann Intensive Care ; 9(1): 114, 2019 Oct 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31591659
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High-flow oxygen therapy via nasal cannula (HFOTNASAL) increases airway pressure, ameliorates oxygenation and reduces work of breathing. High-flow oxygen can be delivered through tracheostomy (HFOTTRACHEAL), but its physiological effects have not been systematically described. We conducted a cross-over study to elucidate the effects of increasing flow rates of HFOTTRACHEAL on gas exchange, respiratory rate and endotracheal pressure and to compare lower airway pressure produced by HFOTNASAL and HFOTTRACHEAL.

METHODS:

Twenty-six tracheostomized patients underwent standard oxygen therapy through a conventional heat and moisture exchanger, and then HFOTTRACHEAL through a heated humidifier, with gas flow set at 10, 30 and 50 L/min. Each step lasted 30 min; gas flow sequence during HFOTTRACHEAL was randomized. In five patients, measurements were repeated during HFOTTRACHEAL before tracheostomy decannulation and immediately after during HFOTNASAL. In each step, arterial blood gases, respiratory rate, and tracheal pressure were measured.

RESULTS:

During HFOTTRACHEAL, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and tracheal expiratory pressure slightly increased proportionally to gas flow. The mean [95% confidence interval] expiratory pressure raise induced by 10-L/min increase in flow was 0.2 [0.1-0.2] cmH2O (ρ = 0.77, p < 0.001). Compared to standard oxygen, HFOTTRACHEAL limited the negative inspiratory swing in tracheal pressure; at 50 L/min, but not with other settings, HFOTTRACHEAL increased mean tracheal expiratory pressure by (mean difference [95% CI]) 0.4 [0.3-0.6] cmH2O, peak tracheal expiratory pressure by 0.4 [0.2-0.6] cmH2O, improved PaO2/FiO2 ratio by 40 [8-71] mmHg, and reduced respiratory rate by 1.9 [0.3-3.6] breaths/min without PaCO2 changes. As compared to HFOTTRACHEAL, HFOTNASAL produced higher tracheal mean and peak expiratory pressure (at 50 L/min, mean difference [95% CI] 3 [1-5] cmH2O and 4 [1-7] cmH2O, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

As compared to standard oxygen, 50 L/min of HFOTTRACHEAL are needed to improve oxygenation, reduce respiratory rate and provide small degree of positive airway expiratory pressure, which, however, is significantly lower than the one produced by HFOTNASAL.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article