Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking.
Begum, Husna; Vishwanath, Swarna; Merenda, Michelle; Tacey, Mark; Dean, Nicola; Elder, Elisabeth; Mureau, Marc; Bezic, Ron; Carter, Pamela; Cooter, Rodney D; Deva, Anand; Earnest, Arul; Higgs, Michael; Klein, Howard; Magnusson, Mark; Moore, Colin; Rakhorst, Hinne; Saunders, Christobel; Stark, Birgit; Hopper, Ingrid.
Afiliação
  • Begum H; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Vishwanath S; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Merenda M; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Tacey M; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Dean N; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Flinders Medical Center, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia.
  • Elder E; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Mureau M; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Bezic R; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Carter P; Refine Cosmetic Clinic, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Cooter RD; Therapeutic Goods Administration, Australian Capital Territory Australia.
  • Deva A; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Earnest A; Macquarie Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Higgs M; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Klein H; Parkside Cosmetic Surgery, South Australia Australia.
  • Magnusson M; South Island Plastic Surgery, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Moore C; School of Medicine, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; Australasian College of Cosmetic Surgery, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Rakhorst H; Refine Cosmetic Clinic, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Saunders C; Refine Cosmetic Clinic, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Stark B; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente and ZGT Almelo, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Hopper I; School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 7(8): e2348, 2019 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31592377
ABSTRACT
Breast device registries monitor devices encompassing breast implants, tissue expanders and dermal matrices, and the quality of care and patient outcomes for breast device surgery. Defining a standard set of quality indicators and risk adjustment factors will enable consistency and adjustment for case-mix in benchmarking quality of care across breast implant registries. This study aimed to develop a set of quality indicators to enable assessment and reporting of quality of care for breast device surgery which can be applied globally.

METHODS:

A scoping literature review was undertaken, and potential quality indicators were identified. Consensus on the final list of quality indicators was obtained using a modified Delphi approach. This process involved a series of online surveys, and teleconferences over 6 months. The Delphi panel included participants from various countries and representation from surgical specialty groups including breast and general surgeons, plastic and reconstructive surgeons, cosmetic surgeons, a breast-care nurse, a consumer, a devices regulator (Therapeutic Goods Administration), and a biostatistician. A total of 12 candidate indicators were proposed Intraoperative antibiotic wash, intraoperative antiseptic wash, preoperative antibiotics, nipple shields, surgical plane, volume of implant, funnels, immediate versus delayed reconstruction, time to revision, reoperation due to complications, patient satisfaction, and volume of activity.

RESULTS:

Three of the 12 proposed indicators were endorsed by the panel preoperative intravenous antibiotics, reoperation due to complication, and patient reported outcome measures.

CONCLUSION:

The 3 endorsed quality indicator measures will enable breast device registries to standardize benchmarking of care internationally for patients undergoing breast device surgery.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article