Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Distinguishing Features of Cetuximab and Panitumumab in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors.
García-Foncillas, Jesús; Sunakawa, Yu; Aderka, Dan; Wainberg, Zev; Ronga, Philippe; Witzler, Pauline; Stintzing, Sebastian.
Afiliação
  • García-Foncillas J; Cancer Institute, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sunakawa Y; Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
  • Aderka D; Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Wainberg Z; David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Ronga P; Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Witzler P; Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Stintzing S; Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM) Charité Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Oncol ; 9: 849, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31616627
ABSTRACT
Cetuximab and panitumumab are two distinct monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and both are widely used in combination with chemotherapy or as monotherapy to treat patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Although often considered interchangeable, the two antibodies have different molecular structures and can behave differently in clinically relevant ways. More specifically, as an immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 isotype mAb, cetuximab can elicit immune functions such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity involving natural killer cells, T-cell recruitment to the tumor, and T-cell priming via dendritic cell maturation. Panitumumab, an IgG2 isotype mAb, does not possess these immune functions. Furthermore, the two antibodies have different binding sites on the EGFR, as evidenced by mutations on the extracellular domain that can confer resistance to one of the two therapeutics or to both. We consider a comparison of the properties of these two antibodies to represent a gap in the literature. We therefore compiled a detailed, evidence-based educational review of the known molecular, clinical, and functional differences between the two antibodies and concluded that they are distinct therapeutic agents that should be considered individually during treatment planning. Available data for one agent can only partly be extrapolated to the other. Looking to the future, the known immune activity of cetuximab may provide a rationale for this antibody as a combination partner with investigational chemotherapy plus immunotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article