Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting Nondiagnostic Home Sleep Apnea Tests Using Machine Learning.
Stretch, Robert; Ryden, Armand; Fung, Constance H; Martires, Joanne; Liu, Stephen; Balasubramanian, Vidhya; Saedi, Babak; Hwang, Dennis; Martin, Jennifer L; Della Penna, Nicolás; Zeidler, Michelle R.
Afiliação
  • Stretch R; David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Ryden A; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Fung CH; David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Martires J; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Liu S; David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Balasubramanian V; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Saedi B; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Hwang D; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Martin JL; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Della Penna N; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Zeidler MR; Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 15(11): 1599-1608, 2019 11 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31739849
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVES:

Home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) is an efficient and cost-effective method of diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, nondiagnostic HSAT necessitates additional tests that erode these benefits, delaying diagnoses and increasing costs. Our objective was to optimize this diagnostic pathway by using predictive modeling to identify patients who should be referred directly to polysomnography (PSG) due to their high probability of nondiagnostic HSAT.

METHODS:

HSAT performed as the initial test for suspected OSA within the Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System was analyzed retrospectively. Data were extracted from pre-HSAT questionnaires and the medical record. Tests were diagnostic if there was a respiratory event index (REI) ≥ 5 events/h. Tests with REI < 5 events/h or technical inadequacy-two outcomes requiring additional testing with PSG-were considered nondiagnostic. Standard logistic regression models were compared with models trained using machine learning techniques.

RESULTS:

Models were trained using 80% of available data and validated on the remaining 20%. Performance was evaluated using partial area under the precision-recall curve (pAUPRC). Machine learning techniques consistently yielded higher pAUPRC than standard logistic regression, which had pAUPRC of 0.574. The random forest model outperformed all other models (pAUPRC 0.862). Preferred calibration of this model yielded the following sensitivity 0.46, specificity 0.95, positive predictive value 0.81, negative predictive value 0.80.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with standard logistic regression models, machine learning models improve prediction of patients requiring in-laboratory PSG. These models could be implemented into a clinical decision support tool to help clinicians select the optimal test to diagnose OSA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autocuidado / Polissonografia / Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono / Aprendizado de Máquina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Autocuidado / Polissonografia / Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono / Aprendizado de Máquina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article