Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of Antidiabetic drugs during pregnancy among U.S. women with Livebirth deliveries in the Mini-Sentinel system.
Mott, Katrina; Reichman, Marsha E; Toh, Sengwee; Kieswetter, Caren; Haffenreffer, Katherine; Andrade, Susan E.
Afiliação
  • Mott K; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA. kam417@mail.harvard.edu.
  • Reichman ME; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Toh S; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kieswetter C; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Haffenreffer K; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Andrade SE; Meyers Primary Care Institute (Fallon Community Health Plan, Reliant Medical Group, and University of Massachusetts Medical School), Worcester, MA, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 441, 2019 Nov 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31775682
BACKGROUND: As the prevalence of diabetes mellitus increases in the population, the exposure to antidiabetic drugs (ADDs) during pregnancies is expected to grow, as has been seen over the last decade. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of ADD use during pregnancy among women in the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database (MSDD) who delivered a liveborn infant. METHODS: We identified qualifying livebirth pregnancies among women aged 10 to 54 years in the MSDD from 2001 to 2013. ADD use was estimated using outpatient pharmacy dispensing claims and days-supplied among three cohorts: all livebirth pregnancies, pregnancies among women with pre-existing diabetes, and pregnancies among women without prior ADD use. RESULTS: Among the 1.9 million pregnancies in the MSDD that resulted in a livebirth from 2001 to 2013, 4.4% were exposed to an ADD. Of the 15,606 pregnancies (0.8%) with pre-existing diabetes, 92.8% were also exposed during the pregnancy period. The most commonly used product in these pregnancies was insulin (75.6% of pregnancies). In contrast, in pregnancies of women without prior ADD use, the most commonly used products were glyburide and insulin, and most of these users were diagnosed with gestational diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of ADD use during pregnancy described here, along with changes in disease incidence and management, highlight the importance of continuing surveillance of ADD utilization patterns and examining the safety and effectiveness of these products in pregnancy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gravidez em Diabéticas / Diabetes Gestacional / Diabetes Mellitus / Hipoglicemiantes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gravidez em Diabéticas / Diabetes Gestacional / Diabetes Mellitus / Hipoglicemiantes Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article