Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determinants Of Patient Experience With Low Back Pain Interdisciplinary Care: A Pre-Post Interventional Study.
Gogovor, Amédé; Visca, Regina; Ware, Mark A; Valois, Marie-France; Bartlett, Gillian; Hunt, Matthew; Ahmed, Sara.
Afiliação
  • Gogovor A; Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Visca R; Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Ware MA; RUIS McGill Centre of Expertise in Chronic Pain, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Valois MF; Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Bartlett G; Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Hunt M; Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Ahmed S; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Pain Res ; 12: 3203-3213, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31819604
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Measuring patients' experiences of health services has become an essential part of quality of care reporting and a means for identifying opportunities for improvement. This study aimed to evaluate change in patient experience in an interdisciplinary primary care program and to estimate the impact on patient experience of sociodemographic, function, pain and general health status, resource utilization, and process variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 6-month interdisciplinary care program for individuals with low back pain (LBP) was implemented at four primary care settings and evaluated using an observational pre/post study design. The change in patient experience was evaluated using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care questionnaire (PACIC) completed at baseline and 6 months post-intervention (n=132). Descriptive and multivariable analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3. RESULTS: The average patient age was 57 (SD: 14) years of age and the majority were female (53%). The mean overall PACIC score was 2.6 (SD: 1.1) at baseline and 3.6 (SD: 0.9) at 6 months. The experience of care improved for 62% of the participants based on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). No significant determinants of overall PACIC change score were identified in the multivariable regression models. CONCLUSION: The lack of association of hypothesized determinants requires further examination of the properties of the PACIC and with a larger sample. Future investigation is needed on the relationship between improved patient experience and outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article