Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing patients' preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider.
Hoke, Tanya P; Berger, Alexander A; Pan, Christine C; Jackson, Lindsey A; Winkelman, William D; High, Rachel; Volpe, Katherine A; Lin, Chee Paul; Richter, Holly E.
Afiliação
  • Hoke TP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic, Reconstructive Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, WIC Suite 10382, 619 19th Street South, 176F, Birmingham, AL, 35249-7333, USA. tanyahokemd@gmail.com.
  • Berger AA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Kaiser San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Pan CC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Jackson LA; Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Winkelman WD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • High R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Volpe KA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Lin CP; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Richter HE; Texas A & M Health Science Center, Temple, TX, USA.
Int Urogynecol J ; 31(6): 1203-1208, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31828405
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

HYPOTHESIS:

Understanding patient preferences regarding provider characteristics is an under-explored area in urogynecology. This study aims to describe patient preferences for urogynecologic care, including provider gender, age, experience, and presence of medical trainees.

METHODS:

This was a multicenter, cross-sectional, survey-based study assessing patient preferences with a voluntary, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire prior to their first urogynecology consult. A 5-point Likert scale addressing provider gender, age, experience, and presence of trainees was used. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics and provider preferences. Chi-squared (or Fisher's exact) test was used to test for associations.

RESULTS:

Six hundred fifteen women participated from eight sites including all geographic regions across the US; 70.8% identified as white with mean age of 58.5 ± 14.2 years. Urinary incontinence was the most commonly reported symptom (45.9%); 51.4% saw a female provider. The majority of patients saw a provider 45-60 years old (42.8%) with > 15 years' experience (60.9%). Sixty-five percent of patients preferred a female provider; 10% preferred a male provider. Sixteen percent preferred a provider < 45 years old, 36% preferred 45-60 years old, and 11% of patients preferred a provider > 60 years old. Most patients preferred a provider with 5-15 or > 15 years' experience (49% and 46%, respectively). Eleven percent preferred the presence of trainees while 24% preferred trainee absence.

CONCLUSION:

Patient preferences regarding urogynecologic providers included female gender and provider age 45-60 years old with > 5 years' experience. Further study is needed to identify qualitative components associated with these preferences.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Preferência do Paciente Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Preferência do Paciente Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article