Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of corneal parameters on intraocular pressure measurements in different tonometry methods.
Zakrzewska, Aleksandra; Wiacek, Marta P; Machalinska, Anna.
Afiliação
  • Zakrzewska A; First Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin 70-111, Poland.
  • Wiacek MP; First Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin 70-111, Poland.
  • Machalinska A; First Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin 70-111, Poland.
Int J Ophthalmol ; 12(12): 1853-1858, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31850168
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the impact of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements performed by three different tonometers.

METHODS:

IOP in 132 healthy eyes of 66 participants was measured using three different tonometry techniques Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), and ICare rebound tonometer (RT). CCT and corneal curvature were assessed.

RESULTS:

In healthy eyes, DCT presents significantly higher values of IOP than GAT (17.34±3.69 and 15.27±4.06 mm Hg, P<0.0001). RT measurements are significantly lower than GAT (13.56±4.33 mm Hg, P<0.0001). Compared with GAT, DCT presented on average 2.51 mm Hg higher values in eyes with CCT<600 µm and 0.99 mm Hg higher results in eyes with CCT≥600 µm. The RT results were lower on average by 1.61 and 1.95 mm Hg than those obtained by GAT, respectively. Positive correlations between CCT in eyes with CCT<600 µm were detected for all IOP measurement techniques, whereas a similar relationship was not observed in eyes with thicker corneas. A correlation between IOP values and keratometry in the group with CCT<600 µm was not detected with any of the tonometry methods. In thicker corneas, a positive correlation was found for GAT and mean keratometry values (R=0.369, P=0.005).

CONCLUSION:

The same method should always be chosen for routine IOP control, and measurements obtained by different methods cannot be compared. All analysed tonometry methods are dependent on CCT; thus, CCT should be taken into consideration for both diagnostics and monitoring.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article