Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of multidisciplinary care teams in reducing major amputation rate in adults with diabetes: A systematic review & meta-analysis.
Albright, Rachel H; Manohar, Nivethitha B; Murillo, Jennifer F; Kengne, Linda Anael M; Delgado-Hurtado, Juan J; Diamond, Matthew L; Acciani, Alyse L; Fleischer, Adam E.
Afiliação
  • Albright RH; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, United States. Electronic address: albrightrh@gmail.com.
  • Manohar NB; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, United States.
  • Murillo JF; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, United States.
  • Kengne LAM; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, United States.
  • Delgado-Hurtado JJ; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, United States; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.
  • Diamond ML; Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States.
  • Acciani AL; Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States.
  • Fleischer AE; Department of Podiatric Medicine and Radiology, Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 161: 107996, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31935416
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To determine the pooled effectiveness of multidiscipinary care teams (MCTs) in reducing major amputation rates in adults with diabetes.

METHODS:

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, searching databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov thru October 2018. We included only before-after studies comparing amputation rates before and after the implementation of a MCT for the prevention of major amputation in adults with diabetes. Our primary outcome was relative risk of major amputation. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a fixed effects model.

RESULTS:

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, and eleven were included in a qualitative analysis. Exposure to a MCT resulted in a protective effect ranging from a RR of 0.44 [p-value < 0.00001 (95% CI 0.38, 0.51) I2 = 67%] to a RR of 0.61 [p-value < 0.0001, (95% CI 0.50, 0.75) I2 = 0%] after sensitivity analysis, and remained robust in qualitative analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Healthcare systems can expect a 39-56% amputation rate reduction after implementing an MCT amputation prevention program. These findings may justify the use of additional resources needed for program implementation by helping healthcare systems predict the anticipated benefit these teams have on "possible limbs saved".

FUNDING:

None.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Comunicação Interdisciplinar / Diabetes Mellitus / Amputação Cirúrgica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Comunicação Interdisciplinar / Diabetes Mellitus / Amputação Cirúrgica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article