Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasound-guided continuous deep serratus anterior plane block versus continuous thoracic paravertebral block for perioperative analgesia in videoscopic-assisted thoracic surgery.
Hanley, Ciara; Wall, Tom; Bukowska, Irmina; Redmond, Karen; Eaton, Donna; Ní Mhuircheartaigh, Róisín; Hearty, Conor.
Afiliação
  • Hanley C; Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Wall T; Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Bukowska I; Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Redmond K; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Eaton D; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Ní Mhuircheartaigh R; Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Hearty C; Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Eur J Pain ; 24(4): 828-838, 2020 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31955478
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The deep serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a promising novel regional anaesthesia technique for blockade of the anterolateral chest wall. Evidence for the efficacy of SAPB versus other analgesic techniques in thoracic surgery remains inadequate.

AIMS:

This study compared ultrasound-guided continuous SAPB with a surgically placed continuous thoracic paravertebral block (SPVB) technique in patients undergoing videoscopic-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).

METHODS:

In a single-centre, double-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority study, we allocated 40 patients undergoing VATS to either SAPB or SPVB, with both groups receiving otherwise standardized treatment, including multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was 48-hr opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included numerical rating scale (NRS) for postoperative pain, patient-reported worst pain score (WPS) as well as functional measures (including mobilization distance and cough strength).

RESULTS:

A 48-hr opioid consumption for the SAPB group was non-inferior compared with SPVB. SAPB was associated with improved NRS pain scores at rest, with cough and with movement at 24 hr postoperatively (p = .007, p = .001 and p = .012, respectively). SAPB was also associated with a lower WPS (p = .008). Day 1 walking distance was improved in the SAPB group (p = .012), whereas the difference in cough strength did not reach statistical significance (p = .071). There was no difference in haemodynamics, opioid side effects, length of hospital stay or patient satisfaction between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

The SAPB, as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen, is non-inferior in terms of 48-hr opioid consumption compared to SPVB and is associated with improved functional measures in thoracic surgical patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03768193.

SIGNIFICANCE:

The SAPB interfascial plane block is an efficacious alternative method of opioid-sparing analgesia in high-risk thoracic surgical patients as part of an enhanced recovery programme.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Analgesia / Bloqueio Nervoso Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Analgesia / Bloqueio Nervoso Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article