Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chemical cleaning methods for prostheses colonized by Candida spp.: A systematic review.
Ribeiro Rocha, Gabriela Dos Santos; Neves Duarte, Talyta; de Oliveira Corrêa, Giovani; Nampo, Fernando Kenji; de Paula Ramos, Solange.
Afiliação
  • Ribeiro Rocha GDS; Graduate student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Londrina (UEL), Brazil. Electronic address: gabisrrocha@gmail.com.
  • Neves Duarte T; Graduate student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Londrina (UEL), Brazil.
  • de Oliveira Corrêa G; Assistant Professor and Post-Graduation Supervisor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Center of Heath Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL), Brazil.
  • Nampo FK; Assistant Professor, Latin American Institute of Life and Nature Sciences, Federal University of Latin American Integration (UNILA), Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil.
  • de Paula Ramos S; Assistant Professor, Center of Biological Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL) Londrina, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent ; 124(6): 653-658, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31987583
ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF

PROBLEM:

Different chemical agents have been used to clean and decontaminate dentures. However, consensus on their effectiveness and protocol for use is lacking.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate chemical cleaning methods used to promote a reduction in or elimination of Candida spp. from dental prostheses. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Searches were performed in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Elsevier, Embase, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, Bvsalud, and Google Scholar. Manual searches were also performed. There were no restrictions on date of publication or language. Randomized clinical trials on the reduction of prosthesis surface colonization by Candida spp. by using chemical agents compared with distilled water were included.

RESULTS:

After the first screening, 52 studies were included, of which 5 were included for quality assessment. The studies evaluated the efficacy of alkaline peroxides, chlorhexidine, and chlorine dioxide. Among the studied solutions, alkaline peroxides demonstrated no effect on the decrease of Candida spp. on prostheses. Chlorhexidine and chlorine dioxide significantly reduced colony-forming unit (CFU) rates of these microorganisms.

CONCLUSIONS:

The evaluated studies presented a high risk of bias and weak evidence of the effects of chemical agents to reduce CFU counts of Candida spp. Only chlorhexidine and chlorine dioxide demonstrated some evidence of a reduction in Candida spp. colonization. Clinical trials with better methodological designs should be performed to clarify the effectiveness of these solutions in prosthesis decontamination.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Candida / Implantes Dentários Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Candida / Implantes Dentários Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article