Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Feasibility Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) for Patients With Offending Histories.
Khalifa, Najat; Talbot, Emily; Barber, Shaun; Schneider, Justine; Bird, Yvonne; Attfield, Julie; Bates, Peter; Walker, Dawn-Marie; Völlm, Birgit.
Afiliação
  • Khalifa N; Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Talbot E; Wells Road Centre, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Barber S; DOCS contracted partner of Amgen, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Schneider J; Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
  • Bird Y; School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Attfield J; Wells Road Centre, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Bates P; Corporate Services, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Walker DM; Public and Patient Involvement, The Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Völlm B; Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry ; 10: 952, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31998164
Objective: To examine the feasibility of conducting a fully powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Individual Placement and Support (IPS). IPS is a form of supported employment which aims to put people into open employment quickly and in accordance with their preferences. It is delivered by employment specialists collocated within clinical teams, and provides time unlimited support for the individual and their employer, along with welfare benefits counselling. Method: A feasibility cluster RCT of treatment as usual (TAU) plus IPS versus TAU alone was conducted over 12 months among patients with offending histories in a community forensic setting in the UK. The feasibility criteria were to achieve 50% recruitment rate; 50% completion rate for IPS; 50% completion rate of all outcome measures; and 80% acceptability rating for IPS. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of people in open employment at 12 months. The secondary outcomes were other vocational and educational activities; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale; Client Service Receipt Inventory; quality of life using the SF12-v2 and EQ5-D3; Social Functioning Questionnaire; Work Limitation Questionnaire; and reoffending. Results: Participants' mean age was 39.2 years. The majority were male (88.9), White British (72.2), and single (72.2%). Over 72% had no higher qualification beyond secondary education; mean years in education was 10.4. Over one third had schizophrenia, one fifth had depression, and the rest had personality disorder as their primary diagnosis. Participants had a lifetime average of 7.5 convictions for 15.5 offences. The recruitment rate of all referrals was 38.3% (IPS n = 11; TAU n = 7). Completion rate for IPS was 54.5, with 45.5% acceptability rating. Completion rates for outcome measures for the groups at baseline and 12 months ranged from 22.2 to 100%. The proportion of people in open employment at 12 months were 9.1 and 0% for IPS and TAU respectively. Conclusion: It is not feasible to conduct a full RCT of IPS in community forensic settings in the UK owing to recruitment and retention difficulties. Conducting a trial of this kind requires a large pool of patients from multiple sites and longer IPS implementation and recruitment periods than those of this study. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02442193.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article