Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pitching shoulder passive flexibility: torque-angle analysis for external rotation and internal rotation.
Wight, Jeff T; Tillman, Mark D; Grover, Guy B; Chow, John W; Borsa, Paul A; Wikstrom, Erik A; Larkin-Kaiser, Kelly.
Afiliação
  • Wight JT; Brooks Rehabilitation College of Healthcare Sciences, Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Tillman MD; WellStar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA.
  • Grover GB; Regeneration Technologies, Inc., Alachua, FL, USA.
  • Chow JW; Center for Neuroscience and Neurological Recovery, Methodist Rehabilitation Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
  • Borsa PA; Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Wikstrom EA; Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Larkin-Kaiser K; Medlior Health Outcomes Research, Calgary, Canada.
Sports Biomech ; 21(8): 877-889, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32026746
ABSTRACT
In this study, a custom device was developed to analyse the pitching shoulder's external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) passive flexibility. We analysed three novel

measures:

the resistance onset angle (ROA = angle where the shoulder begins stretching), rotational stiffness, and torque at the end range of motion (ROM). The purpose was to conduct a bilateral analysis to determine if there are significant differences between the throwing and non-throwing shoulder. Participants were 30 upper level pitchers (13 division I, 17 minor league). During testing, pitchers laid supine on a treatment table and the arm was secured to a rotational wheel with the shoulder abducted 90° and elbow flexed 90°. Dependent t-tests revealed significant (p < 0.01) and relatively extreme bilateral differences for all three variables. The throwing shoulder had increased ER ROA (9°), decreased IR ROA (5.3°), increased ER stiffness (17%), increased IR stiffness (34%), increased ER torque (21%), and increased IR torque (30%). Secondary correlation analysis was completed to determine if the torque-angle variables were good predictors of the end ROM. Stiffness correlations were weak for ER (r = 0.35, p = 0.048) and IR (r = 0.42, p = 0.017) but ROA correlations were strong for ER (r = 0.85, p < 0.001) and IR (r = 0.86, p < 0.001).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação do Ombro / Beisebol Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação do Ombro / Beisebol Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article