Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Increasing Heart Transplant Volume by Expansion of Donor Heart Selection Criteria: A Single-Center Analysis.
Rajagopalan, Navin; Shafii, Alexis E; Dennis, Donna R; Charnigo, Richard; Sekela, Michael E.
Afiliação
  • Rajagopalan N; Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. Electronic address: navin_rajagopalan@yahoo.com.
  • Shafii AE; Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Dennis DR; Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Charnigo R; Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Sekela ME; Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Transplant Proc ; 52(3): 949-953, 2020 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32143873
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Our transplant center recently expanded the acceptance criteria for cardiac donors to increase heart transplant volume. Our purpose was to assess the success of this strategy while maintaining acceptable 1-year survival.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent heart transplantation at our institution from January 2011 through December 2017. This time period was divided into 2 periods 2011 to 2014 (Period A) and 2015 to 2017 (Period B) because we implemented our new donor acceptance policy at the onset of 2015. We compared recipient and donor characteristics from the 2 time periods. The primary outcomes were 1-year graft and patient survival.

RESULTS:

Transplant volume increased in Period B with the expanded donor acceptance policy 128 heart transplants over 36 months compared to 52 transplants in 48 months in Period A. Mean (± SD) recipient age was significantly higher in Period B (54 ± 12 vs 50 ± 15 years; P = .04) whereas other recipient variables were similar. Donors in Period B were significantly older, more likely to be female, had larger body mass index, were located a greater distance from the transplant center, and had a higher sequence number. Female donor to male recipient occurred more often in Period B than in Period A (27% vs 10%; P = .01). Both 1-year patient survival and graft survival were unchanged between Period B (95% for both) and Period A (96% for both).

CONCLUSIONS:

Using a more aggressive donor acceptance policy allowed for an increase in heart transplant volume while maintaining acceptable 1-year graft and patient survival.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doadores de Tecidos / Transplante de Coração Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doadores de Tecidos / Transplante de Coração Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article