Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying the cognitive underpinnings of voice-hearing by comparing never, past and current voice-hearers.
Toh, W L; Tan, E J; Neill, E; Van Rheenen, T E; Gurvich, C; Sumner, P J; Carruthers, S P; Thomas, E H X; Rossell, S L.
Afiliação
  • Toh WL; Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Tan EJ; Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Neill E; Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Van Rheenen TE; Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Gurvich C; Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Sumner PJ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Carruthers SP; Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Thomas EHX; Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, University of Melbourne & Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Rossell SL; Alfred Hospital & Central Clinical School, Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 141(6): 553-562, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32144760
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The current study aimed to compare specific cognitive profiles corresponding to auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) status and elucidate which pattern of cognitive deficits may predict voice-hearing status.

METHOD:

Clinical participants with schizophrenia spectrum disorders were partitioned into (i) current voice-hearers (n = 46), (ii) past voice-hearers (n = 37) and (iii) never voice-hearers (n = 40), and compared with 319 non-clinical controls. Cognitive assessment employed the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), supplemented by the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Colour-Word Interference Test (Stroop) as a robust measure of executive function.

RESULTS:

On the Visual Learning domain, current and past voice-hearers had significantly poorer performance relative to never voice-hearers, who in turn had significantly poorer performance than non-clinical controls. Current and never voice-hearers had significantly poorer performance on the Social Cognition domain relative to non-clinical controls. Current voice-hearers also had significantly poorer performance on the Inhibition domain relative to non-clinical controls. Binary logistic regression revealed that Visual Learning was the only significant cognitive predictor of AVH presence.

CONCLUSION:

Visual learning, and potentially inhibition, may be viable therapeutic targets when addressing cognitive mechanisms associated with AVHs. Future research should focus on investigating additional cognitive mechanisms, employing diverse voice-hearing populations and embarking on related longitudinal studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicologia do Esquizofrênico / Cognição / Transtornos Cognitivos / Alucinações / Audição Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicologia do Esquizofrênico / Cognição / Transtornos Cognitivos / Alucinações / Audição Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article