Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Geographic Variation in Costs of Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery in the United States.
Asemota, Anthony O; Ishii, Masaru; Brem, Henry; Gallia, Gary L.
Afiliação
  • Asemota AO; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Ishii M; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Brem H; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Gallia GL; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Electronic address: ggallia1@jhmi.edu.
World Neurosurg ; 149: e1180-e1198, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145414
BACKGROUND: Geographic variations in health care costs have been reported for many surgical specialties. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we sought to describe national and regional costs associated with transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (TPS). METHODS: Data from the Truven-MarketScan 2010-2014 were analyzed. We examined overall total, hospital/facility, physician, and out-of-pocket payments in patients undergoing TPS including technique-specific costs. Mean payments were obtained after risk adjustment for patient-level and system-level confounders and estimated differences across regions. RESULTS: The estimated overall annual burden was $43 million/year in our cohort. The average overall total payment associated with TPS was $35,602.30, hospital/facility payment was $26,980.45, physician payment was $4685.95, and out-of-pocket payment was $2330.78. Overall total and hospital/facility costs were highest in the West and lowest in the South (both P < 0.001), whereas physician reimbursements were highest in the North-east and lowest in the South (P < 0.001). There were no differences in out-of-pocket expenses across regions. On a national level, there were significantly higher overall total and hospital/facility payments associated with endoscopic compared with microscopic procedures (both P < 0.001); there were no significant differences in physician payments or out-of-pocket expenses between techniques. There were also significant within-region cost differences in overall total, hospital/facility, and physician payments in both techniques as well as in out-of-pocket expenses associated with microsurgery. There were no significant regional differences in out-of-pocket expenses associated with endoscopic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show significant geographic cost disparities associated with TPS. Understanding factors behind disparate costs is important for developing cost containment strategies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipófise / Osso Esfenoide / Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos / Neurocirurgia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hipófise / Osso Esfenoide / Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos / Neurocirurgia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article