Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The importance of processing procedures and threshold values in CT scan segmentation of skeletal elements: An example using the immature os coxa.
Stock, Michala K; Garvin, Heather M; Corron, Louise K; Hulse, Cortney N; Cirillo, Laura E; Klales, Alexandra R; Colman, Kerri L; Stull, Kyra E.
Afiliação
  • Stock MK; Department of Exercise Science, High Point University, United States. Electronic address: mstock@highpoint.edu.
  • Garvin HM; Department of Anatomy, Des Moines University, United States.
  • Corron LK; Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, United States.
  • Hulse CN; Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, United States.
  • Cirillo LE; Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, United States.
  • Klales AR; Forensic Anthropology Program, Washburn of University, United States.
  • Colman KL; Department of Medical Biology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Stull KE; Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, United States; University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Forensic Sci Int ; 309: 110232, 2020 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32151881
As the accessibility and utility of virtual databases of skeletal collections continues to grow, the impact that scan processing procedures has on the accuracy of data obtained from virtual databases remains relatively unknown. This study quantifies the intra- and inter-observer error generated from varying computed tomography (CT) scan processing protocols, including re-segmentation, incrementally varying thresholding value, and data collectors' selection of the threshold value on a set of virtual subadult pelves. Four observers segmented the subadult ossa coxarum from postmortem CT scans of the fully-fleshed bodies of eleven individuals of varying ages. Segmentation protocol was set, with the exception of each observer selecting their own thresholding value for each scan. The resulting smoothed pelvic surfaces were then compared using deviation analyses. Root mean square error (RMSE), average distance deviation, and maximum deviation distances demonstrated that thresholding values of ∼50 HU (Hounsfield units) are easily tolerated, the surfaces generated are robust to error, and threshold value selection does not systematically vary with user experience. The importance of consistent methodology during segmentation protocol is highlighted here, especially with regards to consistency in both selected thresholding value as well as smoothing protocol, as these variables can affect subsequent measurements of the resultant surfaces.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossos Pélvicos / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossos Pélvicos / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article