Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of online education for recruitment to an Alzheimer's disease prevention clinical trial.
Saif, Nabeel; Berkowitz, Cara; Tripathi, Susmit; Scheyer, Olivia; Caesar, Emily; Hristov, Hollie; Hackett, Katherine; Rahman, Aneela; Knowlton, Newman; Sadek, George; Lee, Paige; McInnis, Mark; Isaacson, Richard S.
Afiliação
  • Saif N; Department of Neurology Weill Cornell Medicine & New York-Presbyterian New York New York.
  • Berkowitz C; Department of Neurology Weill Cornell Medicine & New York-Presbyterian New York New York.
  • Tripathi S; Department of Neurology Weill Cornell Medicine & New York-Presbyterian New York New York.
  • Scheyer O; School of Law University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
  • Caesar E; Loyola School of Medicine Chicago Illinois.
  • Hristov H; Department of Neurology Weill Cornell Medicine & New York-Presbyterian New York New York.
  • Hackett K; Department of Psychology Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
  • Rahman A; Department of Neurology Weill Cornell Medicine & New York-Presbyterian New York New York.
  • Knowlton N; Biostatistics Pentara Corporation Salt Lake City Utah.
  • Sadek G; Department of Neurology Weill Cornell Medicine & New York-Presbyterian New York New York.
  • Lee P; College of Letters and Science University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California.
  • McInnis M; Wishbone Productions Boston Massachusetts.
  • Isaacson RS; Department of Neurology Weill Cornell Medicine & New York-Presbyterian New York New York.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y) ; 6(1): e12006, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32211509
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Low awareness of Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials is a recruitment barrier. To assess whether online education may affect screening rates for AD prevention clinical trials, we conducted an initial prospective cohort study (n = 10,450) and subsequent randomized study (n = 351) using an online digital tool AlzU.org.

METHODS:

A total of 10,450 participants were enrolled in an initial cohort study and asked to complete a six-lesson course on AlzU.org, as well as a baseline and 6-month follow-up questionnaire. Participants were stratified into three groups based on lesson completion at 6 months group 1 (zero to one lesson completed), group 2 (two to four lessons), and group 3 (five or more lessons). For the subsequent randomized-controlled trial (RCT), 351 new participants were enrolled in a six-lesson course (n = 180) versus a time-neutral control (n = 171). Screening and enrollment in the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic AD (A4) clinical trial were reported via the 6-month questionnaire and are the primary outcomes.

RESULTS:

Cohort 3.9% of group 1, 5% of group 2, and 8.4% of group 3 screened for the A4 trial. Significant differences were found among the groups (P < 0.001). Post hoc analyses showed differences in A4 screening rates between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.001) and groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.0194). There were no differences in enrollment among the three groups. RCT 2.78% of the intervention group screened for A4 compared to 0% of controls (P = 0.0611).

DISCUSSION:

Online education via the AlzU.org digital tool may serve as an effective strategy to supplement clinical trial recruitment.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article