Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care.
Radionova, Natalia; Becker, Gerhild; Mayer-Steinacker, Regine; Gencer, Deniz; Rieger, Monika A; Preiser, Christine.
Afiliação
  • Radionova N; Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, D-72074, Tuebingen, Germany. natalia.radionova@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
  • Becker G; Clinic for Palliative Care, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Mayer-Steinacker R; Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Gencer D; Department of Medicine III, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Rieger MA; Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, D-72074, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Preiser C; Core Facility Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
BMC Palliat Care ; 19(1): 45, 2020 Apr 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32247316
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explores occupational routines, attitudes and expectations of physicians and nurses with regards to a planned electronic assessment system of PROs.

METHODS:

Ten physicians and nine nurses from various PC settings in Southern Germany were interviewed. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS:

The interviewees were sceptical about the quality of data generated through a patient self-assessment system. They criticised the rigidity of the electronic assessment questionnaire, which the interviewees noted may not fit the profile of all palliative patients. They feared the loss of personal contact between medical staff and patients and favoured in-person conversation and on-site observations on site over the potential system. Interviewees saw potential in being able to discover unseen needs from some patients. Interviewees evaluated the system positively in the case that the system served to broadly orient care plans without affecting or reducing the patient-caregiver relationship.

CONCLUSIONS:

A significant portion of the results touch upon the symbolic acceptance of the suggested system, which stands for an increasing standardisation and technisation of medicine where interpersonal contact and the professional expertise are marginalized. The study results can provide insight for processes and communication in the run-up to and during the implementation of electronic assessment systems.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Pessoal de Saúde / Avaliação das Necessidades / Aprendizado de Máquina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Pessoal de Saúde / Avaliação das Necessidades / Aprendizado de Máquina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article