Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Complication rates of different discectomy techniques for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, Xiaolong; Chamoli, Uphar; Vargas Castillo, Jose; Ramakrishna, Vivek A S; Diwan, Ashish D.
Afiliação
  • Chen X; Spine Labs, Level 3, WR Pitney Building, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
  • Chamoli U; Spine Labs, Level 3, WR Pitney Building, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia. u.chamoli@unsw.edu.au.
  • Vargas Castillo J; School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia. u.chamoli@unsw.edu.au.
  • Ramakrishna VAS; Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery St. George Hospital Campus, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
  • Diwan AD; Spine Labs, Level 3, WR Pitney Building, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
Eur Spine J ; 29(7): 1752-1770, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32274586
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This meta-analysis aims to compare the complication rates of discectomy/microdiscectomy (OD/MD), microendoscopic discectomy (MED), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD), and tubular discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) using general classification and modified Clavien-Dindo classification (MCDC) schemes.

METHODS:

We searched three online databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Overall complication rates and complication rates per the above-mentioned classification schemes were considered as primary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Seventeen RCTs and 20 cohort studies met the eligibility criteria. RCTs reporting OD/MD, MED, PELD, PLDD, and tubular discectomies had overall complication rates of 16.8% and 16.1%, 21.2%, 5.8%, 8.4%, and 25.8%, respectively. Compared with the OD/MD, there was moderate-quality evidence suggesting that PELD had a lower risk of overall complications (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.91) and high-quality evidence suggesting a lower risk of Type I complications per MCDC (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.81). Compared with the OD/MD data from cohort studies, there was low-quality evidence suggesting a higher risk of Type III complications per MCDC (RR = 10.83, 95% CI 1.29-91.18) for MED, higher risk of reherniations (RR = 1.67,95% CI 1.05-2.64) and reoperations (RR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.20-2.55) for PELD, lower risk of overall complication rates (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.70), post-operative complication rates (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.70), Type III complications per MCDC (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.69), reherniations (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.97) and reoperations (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.69) for PLDD.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with the OD/MD, results of this meta-analysis suggest that PELD has a lower risk of overall complications and a lower risk of complications necessitating conservative treatment. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Discotomia / Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral / Vértebras Lombares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Discotomia / Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral / Vértebras Lombares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article