Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab in RA: no predictive value of adalimumab serum levels and anti-adalimumab antibodies for prediction of response to the next bDMARD.
Ulijn, Evy; den Broeder, Nathan; Wientjes, Maike; van Herwaarden, Noortje; Meek, Inger; Tweehuysen, Lieke; van der Maas, Aatke; van den Bemt, Bart Jf; den Broeder, Alfons A.
Afiliação
  • Ulijn E; Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
  • den Broeder N; Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands n.denbroeder@maartenskliniek.nl.
  • Wientjes M; Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
  • van Herwaarden N; Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
  • Meek I; Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Tweehuysen L; Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • van der Maas A; Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
  • van den Bemt BJ; Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
  • den Broeder AA; Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 79(7): 867-873, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32317314
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

After adalimumab treatment failure, tumour necrosis factor inhibition (TNFi) and non-TNFi biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are equally viable options on a group level as subsequent treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on the current best evidence synthesis. However, preliminary data suggest that anti-adalimumab antibodies (anti-drug antibodies, ADA) and adalimumab serum levels (ADL) during treatment predict response to a TNFi as subsequent treatment.

OBJECTIVE:

To validate the association of presence of ADA and/or low ADL with response to a subsequent TNFi bDMARD or non-TNFi bDMARD. Sub-analyses were performed for primary and secondary non-responders.

METHODS:

A diagnostic test accuracy retrospective cohort study was done in consenting RA patients who discontinued adalimumab after >3 months of treatment due to inefficacy and started another bDMARD. Inclusion criteria included the availability of (random timed) serum samples between ≥8 weeks after start and ≤2 weeks after discontinuation of adalimumab, and clinical outcome measurements Disease Activity Score in 28 joints - C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) between 3 to 6 months after treatment switch. Test characteristics for EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) good response (DAS28-CRP based) after treatment with the next (non-)TNFi bDMARD were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic and sensitivity/specificity.

RESULTS:

137 patients were included. ADA presence was not predictive for response in switchers to a TNFi (sensitivity/specificity 18%/75%) or a non-TNFi (sensitivity/specificity 33%/70%). The same was true for ADL levels in patients that switched to a TNFi (sensitivity/specificity 50%/52%) and patients that switched to a non-TNFi (sensitivity/specificity 32%/69%). Predictive value of ADA and ADL were similar for both primary and secondary non-responders to adalimumab.

CONCLUSIONS:

In contrast to earlier research, we could not find predictive value for response to a second TNFi or non-TNFi for either ADA or random timed ADL.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Monitoramento de Medicamentos / Antirreumáticos / Adalimumab / Anticorpos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Monitoramento de Medicamentos / Antirreumáticos / Adalimumab / Anticorpos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article