Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma With Negative Axillary Ultrasound Results Using Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Zhu, An-Qi; Li, Xiao-Long; An, Li-Wei; Guo, Le-Hang; Fu, Hui-Jun; Sun, Li-Ping; Xu, Hui-Xiong.
Afiliação
  • Zhu AQ; Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University Cancer Center, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Li XL; Thyroid Institute Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • An LW; Shanghai Center for Thyroid Diseases, Shanghai, China.
  • Guo LH; Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University Cancer Center, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Fu HJ; Thyroid Institute Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Sun LP; Shanghai Center for Thyroid Diseases, Shanghai, China.
  • Xu HX; Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University Cancer Center, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Ultrasound Med ; 39(10): 2059-2070, 2020 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32367518
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish a scoring system for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma with negative axillary ultrasound (US) results. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 156 breast invasive ductal carcinoma lesions from 156 women were retrospectively enrolled. The features of conventional US and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) qualitative enhancement patterns and quantitative enhancement parameters were analyzed. Subsequently, a scoring system was created by a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The results found that 60 patients (38%) showed ALNM. A scoring system was defined as risk score = 1.75 × (if lesion size ≥20 mm) + 1.93 × (if uncircumscribed margin shown on conventional US) + 1.77 × (if coarse or twisting penetrating vessels shown on CEUS). When the risk scores were less than 1.75, 1.75 to 1.93, 1.94 to 3.70, and 3.70 or higher, the risk rates of ALNM were 0% (0 of 9), 10.7% (5 of 46), 29.2% (14 of 48) and 77.4% (41 of 53), respectively. In comparison with conventional US alone, the scoring system using the combination of conventional US and CEUS showed better discrimination ability in terms of the area under the curve (0.830 versus 0.777; P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: A scoring system based on conventional US and CEUS may improve the prediction of ALNM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Carcinoma Ductal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Carcinoma Ductal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article