A comparative outcomes analysis of patients treated for arteriovenous malformation with LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery by a standard frame-based technique or a frameless technique utilizing 3-dimensional rotational angiography.

ABSTRACT

Previous work at our institution treating arteriovenous malformation (AVM) with radiosurgery (RS) demonstrated superior nidus visualization and geometric accuracy with use of 3-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) compared to biplanar digital subtraction angiography. We have since adopted a unique radiosurgical protocol that utilizes 3DRA in the planning of linear accelerator (LINAC)-based RS delivered in a frameless manner. This study seeks to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated by this novel approach and those treated by our historic frame-based protocol. Clinical data were queried for all patients treated for AVM by single-fraction RS from 2003 to 2017. RICs were identified and classified as radiologic, symptomatic, or permanent. Excellent outcome was defined as nidus obliteration without intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or symptomatic RIC. Clinical predictors of study outcomes were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression using backwards elimination to optimize a predictive model. 131 AVMs in 124 patients were included with a median follow-up of 88 months. 59 AVMs received frame-based RS and 72 AVMs received frameless RS. Rate of obliteration was 64% for frame-based RS and 61% for frameless RS (p = 0.70). Radiologic, symptomatic, and permanent RICs rates were 68%, 17%, and 8%, respectively, for frame-based cases, versus 40% (p < 0.01), 8% (p = 0.13), and 3% (p = 0.15), respectively, for frameless cases. Excellent outcome was achieved in 49% of frame-based cases and 53% of frameless cases (p = 0.68). These results illustrate the safety and effectiveness of frameless LINAC-based AVM RS utilizing 3DRA.