Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trends in Percutaneous Embolization Procedures by Radiologists and Other Specialists.
Topper, Stephen R; Levin, David C; Hansberry, David R; Guez, David; Winokur, Ronald S; Adamo, Robert D; Eschelman, David J.
Afiliação
  • Topper SR; Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., 10th Floor Main, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Electronic address: stephen.topper@jefferson.edu.
  • Levin DC; Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., 10th Floor Main, Philadelphia, PA 19107; HealthHelp, Houston, Texas.
  • Hansberry DR; Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., 10th Floor Main, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
  • Guez D; Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., 10th Floor Main, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
  • Winokur RS; Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., 10th Floor Main, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
  • Adamo RD; Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., 10th Floor Main, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
  • Eschelman DJ; Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S. 10th St., 10th Floor Main, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(6): 961-966, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376176
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate utilization trends in percutaneous embolization among radiologists and nonradiologist providers. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The nationwide Medicare Part B fee-for-service databases for 2005-2016 were used to evaluate percutaneous embolization codes. Six codes describing embolization procedures were reviewed. Physician providers were grouped as radiologists, vascular surgeons, cardiologists, nephrologists, other surgeons, and all others.

RESULTS:

The total volume of Medicare percutaneous embolization procedures increased from 20,262 in 2005 to 45,478 in 2016 (+125%). Radiologists performed 13,872 procedures in 2005 (68% of total volume) and 33,254 in 2016 (73% of total volume), a 140% increase in volume. While other specialists also increased the number of cases performed from 2005 to 2016, radiologists strongly predominated, performing 87% of arterial and 30% of venous procedures in 2016, more than any other single specialty. In 2014 and 2015, a sharp increase in venous embolization cases performed by nonradiologists preceded a sharp decrease in 2016, likely the result of complicated billing codes for venous procedures. Radiologists maintained a steady upward trend in the number of cases they performed during those years.

CONCLUSIONS:

The volume of percutaneous embolization procedures performed in the Medicare population increased from 2005 to 2016, reflecting a trend toward minimally invasive intervention. In 2016, radiologists performed nearly 10 times more arterial embolization procedures than the second highest specialty and more venous embolization procedures than any other single specialty.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialização / Padrões de Prática Médica / Embolização Terapêutica / Radiologistas / Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialização / Padrões de Prática Médica / Embolização Terapêutica / Radiologistas / Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article