Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Guidelines for standardized nomenclature and reporting in uterus transplantation: An opinion from the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium.
Johannesson, Liza; Testa, Giuliano; Flyckt, Rebecca; Farrell, Ruth; Quintini, Cristiano; Wall, Anji; O'Neill, Kathleen; Tzakis, Andreas; Richards, Elliott G; Gordon, Scott M; Porrett, Paige M.
Afiliação
  • Johannesson L; Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Testa G; Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Flyckt R; Fertility Preservation Program, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Farrell R; Fertility Preservation Program, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Quintini C; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Wall A; Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • O'Neill K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Tzakis A; Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Richards EG; Fertility Preservation Program, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Gordon SM; Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Porrett PM; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Am J Transplant ; 20(12): 3319-3325, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32379930
ABSTRACT
Uterus transplantation is a nascent but growing field. To support this growth, the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium proposes guidelines for nomenclature related to operative technique, vascular anatomy, and donor, recipient, and offspring outcomes. In terms of anatomy, the group recommends reporting donor arterial inflow and recipient anastomotic site delivering inflow to the graft and offers standardization of the names for the 4 veins originating from the uterus because of current inconsistency in this particular nomenclature. Seven progressive stages with milestones of success are defined for reporting on uterus transplantation

outcomes:

(1) technical, (2) menstruation, (3) embryo implantation, (4) pregnancy, (5) delivery, (6) graft removal, and (7) long-term follow-up. The 3 primary metrics for success are recipient survival (as reported for other organ transplant recipients), graft survival, and uterus transplant live birth rate (defined as live birth per transplanted recipient). A number of secondary outcomes should also be reported, most of which capture stage-specific milestones, as well as data on graft failure. Outcome metrics for living donors include patient survival, survival free of operative intervention, and data on complications and hospitalizations. Finally, we make specific recommendations on follow-up for offspring born from uterine grafts, which includes specialty surveillance as well as collection and reporting of routine pediatric outcomes. The goal of standardization in reporting is to create consistency and improve the quality of evidence available on the efficacy and value of the procedure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Útero / Transplante de Órgãos / Infertilidade Feminina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Útero / Transplante de Órgãos / Infertilidade Feminina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article