Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ): A Composite Control Measure.
Murphy, Kevin R; Chipps, Bradley; Beuther, David A; Wise, Robert A; McCann, William; Gilbert, Ileen; Eudicone, James M; Gandhi, Hitesh N; Harding, Gale; Coyne, Karin S; Zeiger, Robert S.
Afiliação
  • Murphy KR; Boys Town National Research Hospital, Boys Town, Neb. Electronic address: kevin.murphy@boystown.org.
  • Chipps B; Capital Allergy & Respiratory Disease Center, Sacramento, Calif.
  • Beuther DA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo.
  • Wise RA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
  • McCann W; Allergy Partners, Asheville, NC.
  • Gilbert I; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Del.
  • Eudicone JM; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Del.
  • Gandhi HN; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Del.
  • Harding G; Evidera, Bethesda, Md.
  • Coyne KS; Evidera, Bethesda, Md.
  • Zeiger RS; Departments of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego and Pasadena, Calif.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 8(7): 2263-2274.e5, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32387166
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Asthma exacerbation risk increases with worsening asthma control. Prevailing numerical control tools evaluate only current symptom impairment despite the importance of also assessing risk based on exacerbation history. An easy-to-use questionnaire addressing impairment and risk domains of control is needed.

OBJECTIVE:

To validate a composite asthma control tool that includes impairment and risk assessments (Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire [AIRQ]).

METHODS:

Four-hundred forty-two patients aged ≥12 years with physician-diagnosed asthma who were followed in specialty practices completed 15 impairment and risk questions with dichotomized yes/no responses. Patients spanned all Global Initiative for Asthma severities and were classified as well-controlled, not well-controlled, or very poorly controlled according to a standard of Asthma Control Test (ACT) score plus prior-year exacerbations. Logistic regression analyses identified questions with the greatest predictive validity to discriminate among patients and determine cut points for these 3 classifications.

RESULTS:

The final AIRQ comprises 10 equally weighted yes/no impairment and risk questions. The final 10-item models yielded receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.94 to identify well-controlled versus not well-/very poorly controlled and 0.93 to identify well-/not well-controlled versus very poorly controlled asthma, as reflected by the ACT plus prior-year exacerbations standard. Cut points of 0-1, 2-4, and 5-10 best represented well-, not well-, and very poorly controlled asthma.

CONCLUSIONS:

AIRQ is a rigorously validated composite measure designed to identify adults and adolescents with varying degrees of asthma control. Ongoing investigations will determine test-retest reliability, responsiveness to change, and predictive ability for future exacerbations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article