Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Personal preferences of participation in fall prevention programmes: a descriptive study.
Barmentloo, Lotte M; Olij, Branko F; Erasmus, Vicki; Smilde, Dini; Schoon, Yvonne; Polinder, Suzanne.
Afiliação
  • Barmentloo LM; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO BOX 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. l.barmentloo@erasmusmc.nl.
  • Olij BF; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO BOX 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Erasmus V; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO BOX 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Smilde D; GENERO foundation, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Schoon Y; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Polinder S; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO BOX 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Geriatr ; 20(1): 185, 2020 05 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32466747
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Participation in fall prevention programmes is associated with lower risk of injurious falls among older adults. However participation rates in fall prevention interventions are low. The limited participation in fall prevention might increase with a preference based approach. Therefore, the aims of this study are to a) determine the personal preferences of older adults regarding fall prevention and b) explore the association between personal preferences and participation.

METHODS:

We assessed the personal preferences of older adults and the association between their preferences, chosen programme and participation level. Nine different programmes, with a focus on those best matching their personal preferences, were offered to participants. Twelve weeks after the start of the programme, participation was assessed by questionnaire. Logistic regression was performed to test the association between preferences and participation and an ANOVA was performed to assess differences between the number of preferences included in the chosen programme and participation level.

RESULTS:

Of the 134 participants, 49% preferred to exercise at home versus 43% elsewhere, 46% preferred to exercise alone versus 44% in a group and 41% indicated a programme must be free of charge while 51% were willing to pay. The combination of an external location, in a group and for a fee was preferred by 27%, whereas 26% preferred at home, alone and only for free. The presence of preferences or the extent to which the programme matched earlier preferences was not associated with participation.

CONCLUSION:

Despite the fact that preferences can vary greatly among older adults, local programmes should be available for at least the two largest subgroups. This includes a programme at home, offered individually and for free. In addition, local healthcare providers should cooperate to increase the accessibility of currently available group programmes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidentes por Quedas / Exercício Físico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acidentes por Quedas / Exercício Físico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article