Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of mitral regurgitation on cardiovascular hospitalization and death in newly diagnosed heart failure patients.
Cork, David P; McCullough, Peter A; Mehta, Hirsch S; Barker, Colin M; Gunnarsson, Candace; Ryan, Michael P; Baker, Erin R; Van Houten, Joanna; Mollenkopf, Sarah; Verta, Patrick.
Afiliação
  • Cork DP; Scripps Memorial Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • McCullough PA; Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Mehta HS; San Diego Cardiac Center, SHARP Memorial Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Barker CM; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Gunnarsson C; CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Covington, KY, USA.
  • Ryan MP; CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Covington, KY, USA.
  • Baker ER; CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Covington, KY, USA.
  • Van Houten J; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, 92614, USA.
  • Mollenkopf S; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, 92614, USA.
  • Verta P; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, 92614, USA.
ESC Heart Fail ; 7(4): 1502-1509, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32469120
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Heart failure (HF) carries a poor prognosis, and the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) is not well understood. This analysis aimed to estimate the incremental effect of MR in patients newly diagnosed with HF. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Data from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases were analysed. Included patients had at least one inpatient or two outpatient HF claims. A 6 month post-period after HF index was used to capture MR diagnosis and severity. HF patients were separated into three cohorts without MR (no MR), not clinically significant MR (nsMR), and significant MR (sMR). Time-to-event analyses were modelled to estimate the clinical burden of disease. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or cardiovascular (CV)-related admission. Secondary outcomes were death and CV hospitalization alone. All models controlled for baseline demographics and co-morbidities. Patients with sMR were at significantly higher risk of either death or CV admission compared with patients with no MR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.39]. When evaluating death alone, patients with sMR had significantly higher risk of death (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08-1.43) compared with patients with no MR. When evaluating CV admission alone, patients with MR were at higher risk of hospital admission vs. patients with no MR, and the magnitude was dependent upon the MR severity sMR (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.38-1.74) and nsMR (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.08-1.40).

CONCLUSIONS:

Evidence of MR in retrospective claims significantly increases the clinical burden of incident HF patients. Time to death and CV hospitalizations are increased when MR is clinically significant.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema Cardiovascular / Insuficiência Cardíaca / Insuficiência da Valva Mitral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sistema Cardiovascular / Insuficiência Cardíaca / Insuficiência da Valva Mitral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article