Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options.
Rothwell, Erin; Lamb, Brandy; Johnson, Erin; Gurtcheff, Shawn; Riches, Naomi; Fagan, Melinda; Sabatello, Maya; Johnstone, Erica.
Afiliação
  • Rothwell E; Associate Vice President for Research, Integrity and Compliance, The University of Utah, 75 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
  • Lamb B; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Johnson E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Gurtcheff S; Utah Fertility Center, Pleasant Grove, UT, USA.
  • Riches N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Fagan M; Department of Philosophy, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Sabatello M; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Johnstone E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Ther Adv Reprod Health ; 14: 2633494119899942, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32518912
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies.

METHODS:

Interviews (n = 37) were conducted among female patients who had undergone in vitro fertilization, underwent expanded carrier screening, and were offered pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between July 2016 and July 2017. The interviews were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted on the transcripts.

RESULTS:

Categories that emerged from the data analysis included unexpected outcomes, uncertainty, unanticipated emotional consequences, too much emphasis on the woman's contributions and questions about embryo viability. Patient experiences with genetic technologies during in vitro fertilization played a significant role within these results.

CONCLUSION:

The emotional and psychological impacts of infertility during in vitro fertilization were the primary concerns discussed by participants. Future research is needed to identify ways to help manage unexpected outcomes and continuous uncertainty, including the increasing use of genetic technologies, to not add to the psychological burden of infertility. There is a need to explore more support options or counseling services for patients struggling with infertility during in vitro fertilization treatment.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article