Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prior Manipulation under Anesthesia is a Predictor of Contralateral Manipulation in Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kazarian, Gregory S; Deirmengian, Carl A; Kazarian, Erick R; Chen, Antonia F.
Afiliação
  • Kazarian GS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Deirmengian CA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Kazarian ER; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Chen AF; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
J Arthroplasty ; 35(11): 3285-3288, 2020 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32600817
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are many risk factors for arthrofibrosis and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, no study has elucidated whether a history of MUA increases the risk of contralateral MUA in patients undergoing staged bilateral TKA.

METHODS:

A retrospective review of an institutional database of TKAs was performed. All patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary staged bilateral TKAs were screened for inclusion. Staged bilateral TKAs were viewed as 2 distinct events based on the temporal order in which they occurred TKA#1 (occurred first) and TKA#2 (occurred second). Following TKA#1, patients were split into 2 groups those who underwent MUA (Group MANIP) and those who did not (Group NO MANIP). The subsequent risk of undergoing MUA following TKA#2 was then assessed and compared between the 2 groups. Chi-squared tests were used for comparison.

RESULTS:

A total of 5,330 patients who underwent primary uncomplicated staged bilateral TKAs (10,660 knees) during the study period were identified. Overall, 2.1% of patients underwent MUA following TKA#1 and 1.9% of patients underwent MUA following TKA#2. In the MANIP group, 21.4% of patients underwent MUA following TKA#2, while only 1.5% underwent MUA in the NO MANIP group. This 14.3-fold increase in the risk of MUA in the MANIP group following TKA#2 was statistically significant (21.4% vs 1.5%, absolute risk reduction = 19.9%, relative risk reduction = 93.0%, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION:

Patients who undergo MUA during the first TKA of a staged bilateral TKA are 14.3 times more likely to undergo a subsequent MUA than those who did not undergo MUA following their first TKA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia do Joelho / Anestesia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia do Joelho / Anestesia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article