Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of three different noninvasive ventilation strategies as initial respiratory support in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective study.
Buyuktiryaki, M; Okur, N; Sari, F N; Ozer Bekmez, B; Bezirganoglu, H; Cakir, U; Dizdar, E A; Oguz, S S.
Afiliação
  • Buyuktiryaki M; Division of Neonatology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent, 06800 Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: mbuyuktiryaki@yahoo.com.
  • Okur N; Division of Neonatology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
  • Sari FN; Division of Neonatology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
  • Ozer Bekmez B; Division of Neonatology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
  • Bezirganoglu H; Division of Neonatology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
  • Cakir U; Division of Neonatology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
  • Dizdar EA; Division of Neonatology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
  • Oguz SS; Division of Neonatology, Ankara City Hospital, Bilkent, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
Arch Pediatr ; 27(6): 322-327, 2020 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32651144
BACKGROUND: There is inadequate evidence regarding which noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is superior for initial respiratory support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. OBJECTIVES: To compare the failure of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and neonatal outcomes between nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP), bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as the initial respiratory support with less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. METHODS: Medical records of 419 VLBW infants born at 26-30weeks' gestation who did not require intubation in the delivery room and were initially supported with either NCPAP (n=221), BiPAP (n=101), or NIPPV (n=97) were retrospectively reviewed. The LISA approach was preferred in cases of surfactant requirement. The primary outcome was the failure of NIV within the first 72h of life. Failure of NIV was defined as the persistence or recurrence of one or more of the following: hypoxemia, respiratory acidosis, more than one episode of apnea requiring bag and mask ventilation or more than six episodes of apnea requiring stimulation over a 6-h period. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Failure of NIV within the first 72h of life was significantly higher in the NCPAP group (29.4%) compared with the BiPAP (12.9%) or NIPPV (12.4%) group (P<0.001). However, the BiPAP and NIPPV groups were not different in terms of NIV failure (P=0.91). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that antenatal steroid administration (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.27-0.90; P=0.02) and gestational age˂28weeks (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.18-3.49; P=0.01) were independent factors that influence failure of NIV within the first 72h of life. CONCLUSION: Compared with NCPAP, the use of NIPPV/BiPAP strategies for initial respiratory support can reduce the need for invasive ventilation in infants born at 26-30weeks' gestation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido / Recém-Nascido de muito Baixo Peso / Ventilação não Invasiva Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido / Recém-Nascido de muito Baixo Peso / Ventilação não Invasiva Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article