Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation-Updated Consensus and Review 2020.
Jawa, Vibha; Terry, Frances; Gokemeijer, Jochem; Mitra-Kaushik, Shibani; Roberts, Brian J; Tourdot, Sophie; De Groot, Anne S.
Afiliação
  • Jawa V; Predictive and Clinical Immunogenicity, PPDM, Merck & Co., Kenilworth, NJ, United States.
  • Terry F; EpiVax, Inc., Providence, RI, United States.
  • Gokemeijer J; Discovery Biotherapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cambridge, MA, United States.
  • Mitra-Kaushik S; Biologics Development, Sanofi, Framingham, MA, United States.
  • Roberts BJ; EpiVax, Inc., Providence, RI, United States.
  • Tourdot S; BioMedicine Design, Pfizer Inc., Andover, MA, United States.
  • De Groot AS; EpiVax, Inc., Providence, RI, United States.
Front Immunol ; 11: 1301, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32695107
ABSTRACT
Immune responses to protein and peptide drugs can alter or reduce their efficacy and may be associated with adverse effects. While anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are a standard clinical measure of protein therapeutic immunogenicity, T cell epitopes in the primary sequences of these drugs are the key drivers or modulators of ADA response, depending on the type of T cell response that is stimulated (e.g., T helper or Regulatory T cells, respectively). In a previous publication on T cell-dependent immunogenicity of biotherapeutics, we addressed mitigation efforts such as identifying and reducing the presence of T cell epitopes or T cell response to protein therapeutics prior to further development of the protein therapeutic for clinical use. Over the past 5 years, greater insight into the role of regulatory T cell epitopes and the conservation of T cell epitopes with self (beyond germline) has improved the preclinical assessment of immunogenic potential. In addition, impurities contained in therapeutic drug formulations such as host cell proteins have also attracted attention and become the focus of novel risk assessment methods. Target effects have come into focus, given the emergence of protein and peptide drugs that target immune receptors in immuno-oncology applications. Lastly, new modalities are entering the clinic, leading to the need to revise certain aspects of the preclinical immunogenicity assessment pathway. In addition to drugs that have multiple antibody-derived domains or non-antibody scaffolds, therapeutic drugs may now be introduced via viral vectors, cell-based constructs, or nucleic acid based therapeutics that may, in addition to delivering drug, also prime the immune system, driving immune response to the delivery vehicle as well as the encoded therapeutic, adding to the complexity of assessing immunogenicity risk. While it is challenging to keep pace with emerging methods for the preclinical assessment of protein therapeutics and new biologic therapeutic modalities, this collective compendium provides a guide to current best practices and new concepts in the field.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfócitos T / Proteínas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfócitos T / Proteínas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article