Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aesthetic results following breast cancer surgery: A prospective study on 6515 cases from ten Italian Senonetwork breast centers.
Serra, M; Li, A Quattrini; Cataliotti, L; Cianchetti, E; Corsi, F; De Vita, R; Fabiocchi, L; Fortunato, L; Friedman, D; Klinger, M; Marotti, L; Murgo, R; Ponti, A; Roncella, M; Del Turco, M Rosselli; Rinaldi, S; Surace, A; Taffurelli, M; Tinterri, C; Tomatis, M; Mano, M P.
Afiliação
  • Serra M; UOC di Chirurgia Generale e Della Mammella Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: margherita.serra@aosp.bo.it.
  • Li AQ; Centro Senologico Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana Ospedale Santa Chiara, Pisa, Italy.
  • Cataliotti L; Senonetwork Italia, Florence, Italy.
  • Cianchetti E; Breast Centre Asl 02 Abruzzo, P.O. G. Bernabeo Ortona, Chieti, Italy.
  • Corsi F; Breast Unit, Surgery Department, ICS Maugeri S.p.A. SB, Pavia, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences L. Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • De Vita R; Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Roma "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
  • Fabiocchi L; Centro Di Senologia Rimini - Sant'Arcangelo di Romagna, Rimini, Italy.
  • Fortunato L; UOSD Centro di Senologia, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy.
  • Friedman D; Policlinico San Martino di Genova. University of Genova, DISC Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Genova, Italy.
  • Klinger M; Breast Centre Humanitas - Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Humanitas Mirasole Spa, Rozzano, (Milan), Italy.
  • Marotti L; European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists, Florence, Italy.
  • Murgo R; Dipartimento di Oncoematologia/Unità Operativa Complessa di Chirurgia Senologica, IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.
  • Ponti A; CPO Piemonte - SSD Epidemiologia Screening - AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
  • Roncella M; Centro Senologico Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana Ospedale Santa Chiara, Pisa, Italy.
  • Del Turco MR; Radiologist Consultant, Rome, Italy.
  • Rinaldi S; UOSVD di Chirurgia Senologica Ospedale San Paolo, Bari, Italy.
  • Surace A; CPO Piemonte - SSD Epidemiologia Screening - AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
  • Taffurelli M; UOC di Chirurgia Generale e Della Mammella Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Tinterri C; Breast Centre Humanitas - Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Humanitas Mirasole Spa, Rozzano, (Milan), Italy.
  • Tomatis M; CPO Piemonte - SSD Epidemiologia Screening - AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
  • Mano MP; CPO Piemonte - AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 46(10 Pt A): 1861-1866, 2020 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32723610
ABSTRACT
Breast cancer treatment has deeply changed in the last decades, since clinical and oncological cure cannot be achieved without patient's satisfaction in term of aesthetic outcomes. Several methods have been proposed to objectively assess these results. However, Italian breast centers have not yet agreed on measurable, reproducible and validated aesthetic outcome indicators to monitor their performance.

METHODS:

The study was designed and conducted by Senonetwork, a not-for-profit association of Italian breast centers. Ten breast centers were selected based on specific eligibility criteria. This multicentre observational prospective study recruited 6515 patients with diagnosis of in situ or invasive breast cancer who underwent breast surgery in the years 2013-2016. Thirteen indicators of aesthetic results and of related quality of care were analyzed. Data collection and analysis were conducted using a common study database.

RESULTS:

On average, seven out of ten centers were able to collect data on the proposed indicators with a proportion of missing values < 25%. By expert consensus based on study results, some seven indicators have been defined as "mandatory" while the remaining six have been defined as "recommended" because they require further refinement before they can be proposed for monitoring aesthetic outcomes or because there are doubts on the feasibility of data collection. The minimum standard is reached for 5 of 13 indicators. This finding and the wide range between centers reveal that there is ample room for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS:

From the present study useful measurable aesthetic parameters have emerged, leading to the definition of target objectives that breast centers can use for benchmarking and improvement of quality of care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mastectomia Segmentar / Mamoplastia / Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde / Aparência Física / Mastectomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mastectomia Segmentar / Mamoplastia / Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde / Aparência Física / Mastectomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article