Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosis in a snap: a pilot study using Snapchat in radiologic didactics.
Spieler, Bradley; Batte, Catherine; Mackey, Dane; Henry, Caitlin; Danrad, Raman; Sabottke, Carl; Pirtle, Claude; Mussell, Jason; Wallace, Eric.
Afiliação
  • Spieler B; Diagnostic Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 343, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. bspie1@lsuhsc.edu.
  • Batte C; Department of Physics & Astronomy, Louisiana State University, 459-B Nicholson Hall, Tower Drive, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
  • Mackey D; Diagnostic Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 343, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
  • Henry C; Diagnostic Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 343, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
  • Danrad R; Diagnostic Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 343, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
  • Sabottke C; Diagnostic Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 343, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
  • Pirtle C; Diagnostic Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 343, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
  • Mussell J; Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1901 Perdido Street, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA.
  • Wallace E; Diagnostic Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Room 343, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Emerg Radiol ; 28(1): 93-102, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32728998
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate Snapchat, an image-based social media platform, as a tool for emergency radiologic didactics comparing image interpretation on mobile devices with conventional analysis on a classroom screen. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Seven radiology residents (4 juniors, 3 seniors;4 males, 3 females; 28.4 years old, ± 1.7 years) were shown 5 emergent radiologic cases using Snapchat and 5 cases of similar content and duration on a classroom projector over 4 weeks. All images depicted diagnoses requiring immediate communication to ordering physicians. Performance was scored 0-2 (0 = complete miss, 1 = major finding, but missed the diagnosis, 2 = correct diagnosis) by two attending radiologists in consensus.

RESULTS:

All residents performed better on Snapchat each week. In weeks 1-4, juniors scored 21/40 (52.5%), 23/40 (57.5%), 19/40 (47.5%), and 18/40 (45%) points using Snapchat compared with 13/40 (32.5%), 23/40 (57.5%), 14/40 (35%), and 13/40 (32.5%), respectively, each week by projector, while seniors scored 19/30 (63.3%), 21/30 (70%), 27/30 (90%), and 21/30 (70%) on Snapchat versus 16/30 (53.3%), 19/30 (63.3%), 20/30 (66.7%), and 20/30 (66.7%) on projector. Four-week totals showed juniors scoring 81/160 (50.6%) on Snapchat and 63/160 (39.4%) by projector compared with seniors scoring 88/120 (73.3%) and 75/120 (62.5%), respectively. Performance on Snapchat was statistically, significantly better than via projector during weeks 1 and 3 (p values 0.0019 and 0.0031).

CONCLUSION:

Radiology residents interpreting emergency cases via Snapchat showed higher accuracy compared with using a traditional classroom screen. This pilot study suggests that Snapchat may have a role in the digital radiologic classroom's evolution.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Mídias Sociais / Internato e Residência Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Mídias Sociais / Internato e Residência Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article