Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Nuclear Cataract with Smartphone-Attachable Slit-Lamp Device.
Yazu, Hiroyuki; Shimizu, Eisuke; Okuyama, Sho; Katahira, Takuya; Aketa, Naohiko; Yokoiwa, Ryota; Sato, Yasunori; Ogawa, Yoko; Fujishima, Hiroshi.
Afiliação
  • Yazu H; Department of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa 230-0063, Japan.
  • Shimizu E; Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan.
  • Okuyama S; OUI Inc., Tokyo 160-0022, Japan.
  • Katahira T; Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan.
  • Aketa N; OUI Inc., Tokyo 160-0022, Japan.
  • Yokoiwa R; Department of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa 230-0063, Japan.
  • Sato Y; Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan.
  • Ogawa Y; Department of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa 230-0063, Japan.
  • Fujishima H; Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 10(8)2020 Aug 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32784828
ABSTRACT

Background:

Visual impairments and age-related eye diseases need to be detected and treated in a timely manner. However, this is often hampered by lack of appropriate medical equipment. We have invented a portable, recordable, and smartphone-attachable slit-lamp device, called the Smart Eye Camera (SEC). The aim of this study was to compare evaluating nuclear cataract (NUC) between the SEC and the conventional, non-portable slit-lamp microscope.

Methods:

A total of 128 eyes of 64 Japanese patients (mean age 73.95 ± 9.28 years; range 51‒92 years; female 34) were enrolled. The NUC was classified into four grades (grade 0 to 3) based on three standard photographs of nuclear opacities according to the WHO classification by ophthalmologists. An ophthalmic healthcare assistant (non-ophthalmologist) filmed the eyes in video mode by the SEC and an ophthalmologist graded the NUC. Grade correlation and inter-rater reproducibility were determined.

Results:

NUC grading by the two approaches correlated significantly (both eyes r = 0.871 [95%CI 0.821 to 0.907; p < 0.001]). Inter-rater agreement was high (weighted κ = 0.807 [95%CI 0.798 to 0.816; p < 0.001]).

Conclusions:

This study suggests that the SEC is as reliable as the conventional non-portable slit-lamp microscope for evaluating NUC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article